A Useful Practice Tool, but Room for Improvement
First, some of the questions are poorly written, which can cause confusion and lead to frustration during study sessions. These types of questions don’t always reflect the quality of questions that students may encounter on the actual exam.
Additionally, the reference book lists older types of questions that might not be relevant to the current format of the exam. Given how much the field evolves, I’d recommend that the developers update these materials to better align with the current exam standards.
On a positive note, Part 1 of the Chiro Board Review series is much more polished and relevant, so I hope the developers focus on bringing Part 2 up to the same level of quality.
Response from developer
Thank you for your comments. We are absolutely focused on bringing Boards 2 & 3 on the same polish that we have Boards 1! If you or anyone you know are interested in writing questions post exams, please email us at admin@proexamprep.com
