Game raiting
Ek number hai bhai sahab best cricket scoring app hai main to refer krunga agar score count krne ghapala hota ya ball count krne to yeh app download kro
👌app.. highly recommend
Great app to capture your Passion and provide you Stats & Insights
Not giving any importance to shorter format bowlers
Dear CricHeroes Team,
I would like to request a review of the way bowler badges/tags are calculated for short-format tennis-ball cricket, especially matches of 8 overs or fewer.
I feel that the current system does not fully recognise the impact of bowlers in these very short formats.
In an 8-over-or-shorter match, a bowler generally gets only 1 or 2 overs. That means every over is extremely important, and taking a wicket in such a short spell can have a much greater impact on the result than it might appear from the overall statistics.
I have personally taken more than 100 wickets in this format, while averaging close to one wicket per over. My economy rate is also below 7.5, which I believe is a very strong performance in such a high-pressure, short-format environment. There are also very few bowlers who perform better than this consistently.
Therefore, I am surprised that performances of this kind are still classified only as “Aspirant,” the lowest bowler badge.
I completely understand the need for statistical calculations and comparisons. However, I request CricHeroes to consider whether the current model gives enough weight to:
Wickets per over or wickets per spell
Bowling strike rate
Economy rate relative to the short-format environment
Dot-ball percentage
Impact of taking wickets when a bowler has only 1–2 overs available
Separate benchmarks for 6–8 over tennis-ball matches
Consistency across a significant number of matches
A bowler taking nearly one wicket every over while maintaining an economy below 7.5 in an 8-over format is making a significant contribution to the team. The shorter the match, the greater the importance of each individual over and wicket.
I would therefore request CricHeroes to review the calculation and classification of bowler badges for short-format tennis-ball cricket, and consider creating format-specific benchmarks rather than comparing these performances with longer-format bowling.
I believe this would make the badges more meaningful and accurately recognise bowlers who are having a major impact in grassroots short-format cricket.
Thank you for listening to the feedback, and I hope the CricHeroes team will consider reviewing this aspect of the player-rating system.
Regards,
Anoop Francis
I would like to request a review of the way bowler badges/tags are calculated for short-format tennis-ball cricket, especially matches of 8 overs or fewer.
I feel that the current system does not fully recognise the impact of bowlers in these very short formats.
In an 8-over-or-shorter match, a bowler generally gets only 1 or 2 overs. That means every over is extremely important, and taking a wicket in such a short spell can have a much greater impact on the result than it might appear from the overall statistics.
I have personally taken more than 100 wickets in this format, while averaging close to one wicket per over. My economy rate is also below 7.5, which I believe is a very strong performance in such a high-pressure, short-format environment. There are also very few bowlers who perform better than this consistently.
Therefore, I am surprised that performances of this kind are still classified only as “Aspirant,” the lowest bowler badge.
I completely understand the need for statistical calculations and comparisons. However, I request CricHeroes to consider whether the current model gives enough weight to:
Wickets per over or wickets per spell
Bowling strike rate
Economy rate relative to the short-format environment
Dot-ball percentage
Impact of taking wickets when a bowler has only 1–2 overs available
Separate benchmarks for 6–8 over tennis-ball matches
Consistency across a significant number of matches
A bowler taking nearly one wicket every over while maintaining an economy below 7.5 in an 8-over format is making a significant contribution to the team. The shorter the match, the greater the importance of each individual over and wicket.
I would therefore request CricHeroes to review the calculation and classification of bowler badges for short-format tennis-ball cricket, and consider creating format-specific benchmarks rather than comparing these performances with longer-format bowling.
I believe this would make the badges more meaningful and accurately recognise bowlers who are having a major impact in grassroots short-format cricket.
Thank you for listening to the feedback, and I hope the CricHeroes team will consider reviewing this aspect of the player-rating system.
Regards,
Anoop Francis
Show more
Feature Request: 3 Crucial updates for platform Fairness
I love the app, but my emails to support have gone unanswered. Please share these 3 structured suggestions with your core Product/Feature Team:
1. “Weekend Player” Award: Working professionals only play Saturdays/Sundays. They cannot statistically compete with daily players. A separate "Weekend Player" recognition category based on weekend match data would motivate corporate players without affecting daily regulars.
2. Mandatory Match Fee Status: Lock individual player stats/highlights for a match until their match fee is marked as paid and verified by the captain. This creates transparent accounting and stops payment delays before the game even begins.
3. Payment Dispute Mechanism: If a personal dispute happens and a captain falsely marks a player as unpaid, the player needs a “Dispute Payment” button to upload UPI/transaction screenshots. CricHeroes should verify this independently. To stop misuse:
- Valid player claim: Warning to captain, then a 2-month account suspension for repeat offenses.
- Fraudulent player claim: Warning to player, then a 2-month suspension.
Please implement these to protect genuine players from captain bias!
1. “Weekend Player” Award: Working professionals only play Saturdays/Sundays. They cannot statistically compete with daily players. A separate "Weekend Player" recognition category based on weekend match data would motivate corporate players without affecting daily regulars.
2. Mandatory Match Fee Status: Lock individual player stats/highlights for a match until their match fee is marked as paid and verified by the captain. This creates transparent accounting and stops payment delays before the game even begins.
3. Payment Dispute Mechanism: If a personal dispute happens and a captain falsely marks a player as unpaid, the player needs a “Dispute Payment” button to upload UPI/transaction screenshots. CricHeroes should verify this independently. To stop misuse:
- Valid player claim: Warning to captain, then a 2-month account suspension for repeat offenses.
- Fraudulent player claim: Warning to player, then a 2-month suspension.
Please implement these to protect genuine players from captain bias!
Show more
Response from developer
Thank you for your review. Enjoy reading & keep supporting us :) If you have any feedback or suggestion, you could write to us at +918141665555. We would love to hear from you!
Great
It’s amazing app and easy to use
