Doesn’t even work
Worthless App
Response from developer
Thank you for your review. Please do get in contact with us through 'contact us' in the about section of the app and we will be happy to assist with accessing your entitled content. Thanks, The Digital Support Team
Hopeless
Response from developer
Thanks for your review, and we're really sorry to hear you're experiencing difficulties. For further assistance, please email apps@futurenet.com, including a brief description of the problem you're facing and any relevant details or screenshots, and our app support team will be happy to assist further. Thanks, The Digital Support Team
Irritating App
It needs re-engineering by someone who understands CX.
Response from developer
Thanks for your review. If you require further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact apps@futurenet.com, and our support team will be happy to provide further assistance if needed. Thanks, The Digital Support Team
Latest app version is rubbish
Over 60 years
Couldn’t log in after update
Avoid at all costs
You owe me!
Failure to download editions
Broken since iOS 14.2
New app doesn’t work
I read the web content and pay for the magazine but the web content is jumpy, interrupted by ads loading and pop ups. The nav is totally biased towards the PDF making access to the web section clunky.
But I love the content.
Please just sort out the nav.
App not working
Too many adverts
Does the job
Re-revised my review down to one star.
Latest version doesn’t open the mag at the page you left it at. When I tilt my iPad all the text goes blurry before settling again. Can’t I just have the old version back, it wasn’t broken...
Latest updated version also now doesn’t fit on the page properly and every page can slide up or down. The old app at least showed me the entire page, so I’ve edited my review and dropped a star.
Original review....
Ok, you pestered me for a review: so here it is.
Cycling Weekly app is functional. It lets you read the magazine and mostly delivers it on time and without hassle.
However, the layout is just the print layout so glorious big pictures get spread across two pages and zooming to read text is clumsy, especially near the edge of pages. Some pictures still show the marks used in illustrator to lay them out which isn't pretty.
3 stars for a functional electronic equivalent to the paper magazine which mostly works and is convenient but lacks anything else.
The green option
Absolutely useless!!!
My advice, steer well clear of this App, based on my experience I would not trust the company behind this to organise a doll's tea party on a sunny day!
iPad subscription the way forward
Within a couple of weeks I was very happy with the magazine but had a few issues with the iPad version so contacted them and to my surprise these issues were addressed almost immediately and my reading pleasure was complete.
Would recommend to anyone who has an interest in cycling, particularly as there is an iPad subscription now which I suspect many cyclists would wish to support given most are ardent environmental carers and would not want to see unnecessary paper use.
Onwards and upwards and keep leading the rest of the field!!
Great job...
Cycling Weekly app review
Problem fixed, works a treat now!
Great Mag - Half Arsed App
My initial excitement at now being able to get the mag on day of publication again (I am at work when the post arrives) was tempered by the slow, buggy installation process - the FREE subscriber button would not respond on the first three downloads.
Once loaded, the app does what it does pretty well.
What it doesn't do, is use the most basic and appealing features of the ipad - the ability to view in portrait or landscape and to freely zoom.
What is the point of double page spread photography (which can be stunning) when you can only view one half at a time? As a minor point, if I were a key advertiser who had booked a double page ad, I would be less than happy...
The other reader/advertiser interface that misses the mark is that it appears the ability to zoom on the page has been disabled for ads... as a reader I am just as likely to want to zoom to get a better view of an advertiser's product or copy as I am an editorial page - why this basic omission?
It won't take much to fix these issues and the app will be a whole lot better for it...
