
Gem Identifier - AI Scanner
Get Price of Your Mineral
About
Instantly identify gemstones and minerals by simply taking a photo. This advanced AI scanner analyzes a stone's properties to provide its name, market value, and a full description. Perfect for collectors, enthusiasts, and anyone curious about rocks.
What's New in Gem Identifier
1.0
August 4, 2025
Subscriptions & In-App Purchases
Weekly Subscription
Weekly Subscription for Gem Identifier
Developer apps
FAQ
How does Gem Identifier work?
Gem Identifier uses advanced machine learning algorithms and a comprehensive database to analyze photos of stones. It examines color, clarity, structure, and optical properties to identify the gem and provide its market value and description.
What kind of stones can Gem Identifier identify?
The app's AI engine has been trained on thousands of specimens, ranging from common quartz varieties to rare precious stones, ensuring reliable identification for a wide array of minerals.
Is Gem Identifier free to use?
The app is free to download, but its core AI scanning and analysis functionality requires an active subscription. Subscription plans include weekly and annual options.
What are the subscription costs for Gem Identifier?
Gem Identifier offers a Weekly Subscription for $4.99/7 days and an Annual Subscription for $39.99/year. These subscriptions unlock the AI scanning and test analysis features.
Does Gem Identifier have ads?
No, Gem Identifier does not contain advertisements. The app's monetization is solely through its subscription model for advanced features.
What devices is Gem Identifier compatible with?
Gem Identifier is designed for iOS devices, including iPhone, iPad, and iPod. It is suitable for users aged 4 and above.
How often is Gem Identifier updated?
Gem Identifier was last updated on August 4, 2025, with version 1.0. Future updates will likely focus on expanding the gemstone database and improving AI accuracy.
What do users think of Gem Identifier?
Based on available data, Gem Identifier has a rating of 3.7 stars from 3 ratings. This suggests a mixed but generally positive reception from its early users.


