735madhav
Good coverage. Easy to nevigate
Biased attitude of journalism
I have personally been subscribed to your services for the past two years. I subscribed to your Dainik Bhaskar app, had your newspaper delivered to my home, and many of my friends also subscribed to and regularly read your newspaper.
However, today I did not see a single proper report or meaningful coverage from your platform regarding the large public gathering at Jantar Mantar against the UGC and the current reservation-related issues.
This kind of selective coverage reflects a clear attitude and raises serious questions about your editorial priorities. Because of this, I, along with my friends, have decided to cancel our subscriptions permanently.
I alone have contributed around 20 subscriptions to your platform, and I will continue to encourage others to reconsider their subscriptions as well as a long-time reader and subscriber, I expected balanced and comprehensive journalism—not selective coverage. This is extremely disappointing.
However, today I did not see a single proper report or meaningful coverage from your platform regarding the large public gathering at Jantar Mantar against the UGC and the current reservation-related issues.
This kind of selective coverage reflects a clear attitude and raises serious questions about your editorial priorities. Because of this, I, along with my friends, have decided to cancel our subscriptions permanently.
I alone have contributed around 20 subscriptions to your platform, and I will continue to encourage others to reconsider their subscriptions as well as a long-time reader and subscriber, I expected balanced and comprehensive journalism—not selective coverage. This is extremely disappointing.
Show more
Gill
Please we need more politic news.you published too much death news.
Real and true
Best news in the world
Inconsistency between e-news-paper and web/app news feeds
I found a serious inconsistency in Dainik Bhaskar’s reporting regarding the Baseri Nagar Palika, Dholpur, Rajasthan reservation.
The digital/web feed reports Baseri as SC-reserved, while the e-paper/physical newspaper reports the same seat as General/Unreserved. These are directly contradictory reports about the same municipality and the same reservation lottery.
I checked multiple reports and sources while trying to verify the actual reservation status, but this inconsistency itself has made it difficult for readers to determine which information is correct.
Such contradictory reporting on an election-related reservation is misleading and can create serious confusion for potential candidates and the public. Dainik Bhaskar should verify the official reservation order and immediately correct the incorrect version across all platforms, with a clear correction/update.
I request Dainik Bhaskar to maintain consistency between its digital, e-paper, and print editions, particularly for important election-related information.
The digital/web feed reports Baseri as SC-reserved, while the e-paper/physical newspaper reports the same seat as General/Unreserved. These are directly contradictory reports about the same municipality and the same reservation lottery.
I checked multiple reports and sources while trying to verify the actual reservation status, but this inconsistency itself has made it difficult for readers to determine which information is correct.
Such contradictory reporting on an election-related reservation is misleading and can create serious confusion for potential candidates and the public. Dainik Bhaskar should verify the official reservation order and immediately correct the incorrect version across all platforms, with a clear correction/update.
I request Dainik Bhaskar to maintain consistency between its digital, e-paper, and print editions, particularly for important election-related information.
Show more
