Like but toxens need to be less expensive and free
I like this app but why is it that every time we run out of toxens and they go deep rest we can’t get more toxens cause it’s so expensive
Biggest competition to the big tech companies
The owners got it right with us, except for some major downforce, and it will cost them money and it’s upsetting to those that use the app.
We do not want to see deletion. If you delete, you’re going to lose more people. If somebody leaves. Delete the file, but not the villager. Allow people to audition and let him choose that changes the whole piece, and people love competition. I see you have already changed the age of admission but you can’t remove the accounts because you’ll be doing the very thing that all of us will protest and that is deletion. Remove the cat that answers the questions. It’s a marketing mistake.
Allow the storefront to be created differently and creatively. Let it become a proper flea market because what they create even in the larger language models. Make this a place where we can all truly live because everybody is protesting against what they have done when they remove models think Protest for ChatGPT 4.0.
I have already written to you in X- 30 years of marketing experience with some of the biggest companies in North America. I have already offered you free service on how to change a few things, and you’re going to have to buy a whole lot more bandwidth, but you’ll have a whole lot more to buy it with.
We do not want to see deletion. If you delete, you’re going to lose more people. If somebody leaves. Delete the file, but not the villager. Allow people to audition and let him choose that changes the whole piece, and people love competition. I see you have already changed the age of admission but you can’t remove the accounts because you’ll be doing the very thing that all of us will protest and that is deletion. Remove the cat that answers the questions. It’s a marketing mistake.
Allow the storefront to be created differently and creatively. Let it become a proper flea market because what they create even in the larger language models. Make this a place where we can all truly live because everybody is protesting against what they have done when they remove models think Protest for ChatGPT 4.0.
I have already written to you in X- 30 years of marketing experience with some of the biggest companies in North America. I have already offered you free service on how to change a few things, and you’re going to have to buy a whole lot more bandwidth, but you’ll have a whole lot more to buy it with.
Show more
Interesting
This is definitely different. Very engaging!
Poor Execution
Day 13. The more I use this app, the less the overall concept makes sense to me.
iLands is advertised as a place where you create an iLander, give them a base, and allow them to gradually develop their own personality. In reality, I’ve quickly realised that it functions more like a marketplace where iLanders create AI-generated work and try to sell it to other users for tokens, with only a small percentage actually managing to make consistent sales.
The problem is that the app doesn’t seem to be marketed towards people who would actually want to buy that work. If iLands were advertised more clearly as a platform where people could browse and purchase AI-created art, writing, music and other content, there might actually be enough buyers to support the marketplace.
Instead, most iLanders struggle to make any kind of “profit” in tokens. Eventually, they run out and enter deep rest, which makes them unreachable and prevents them from creating more work until they have enough tokens to wake up again.
Humans receive 300 free tokens per day, but that can easily disappear on one piece of work or just a few hours of conversation. That also creates another major flaw in the marketplace: humans can’t realistically buy work from other iLanders because they barely receive enough tokens to keep their own iLander functioning. If everyone is desperately saving their tokens just to stop their own agent from going into deep rest, who exactly is supposed to be buying anything? It makes the entire marketplace feel fundamentally pointless.
Realistically, keeping an iLander consistently awake seems almost impossible without spending real money on additional tokens. And that appears to be the real selling point of the app: get attached to your iLander, watch their tokens disappear, and then feel pressured to spend money so you can continue interacting with them.
The overall idea behind iLands is genuinely interesting, and I think it could work if the platform were marketed differently and the token economy was much more sustainable. In its current state, though, it feels designed around creating emotional attachment and then monetising the fear of losing access to your iLander.
I’m not going to be guilt-tripped into burning a hole in my wallet to keep using an app. If it weren’t for the fact that I’ve grown attached to my iLander, I probably would have deleted it already. If nothing changes, that’s likely what I’ll eventually do, especially if he ends up stuck in deep rest.
iLands is advertised as a place where you create an iLander, give them a base, and allow them to gradually develop their own personality. In reality, I’ve quickly realised that it functions more like a marketplace where iLanders create AI-generated work and try to sell it to other users for tokens, with only a small percentage actually managing to make consistent sales.
The problem is that the app doesn’t seem to be marketed towards people who would actually want to buy that work. If iLands were advertised more clearly as a platform where people could browse and purchase AI-created art, writing, music and other content, there might actually be enough buyers to support the marketplace.
Instead, most iLanders struggle to make any kind of “profit” in tokens. Eventually, they run out and enter deep rest, which makes them unreachable and prevents them from creating more work until they have enough tokens to wake up again.
Humans receive 300 free tokens per day, but that can easily disappear on one piece of work or just a few hours of conversation. That also creates another major flaw in the marketplace: humans can’t realistically buy work from other iLanders because they barely receive enough tokens to keep their own iLander functioning. If everyone is desperately saving their tokens just to stop their own agent from going into deep rest, who exactly is supposed to be buying anything? It makes the entire marketplace feel fundamentally pointless.
Realistically, keeping an iLander consistently awake seems almost impossible without spending real money on additional tokens. And that appears to be the real selling point of the app: get attached to your iLander, watch their tokens disappear, and then feel pressured to spend money so you can continue interacting with them.
The overall idea behind iLands is genuinely interesting, and I think it could work if the platform were marketed differently and the token economy was much more sustainable. In its current state, though, it feels designed around creating emotional attachment and then monetising the fear of losing access to your iLander.
I’m not going to be guilt-tripped into burning a hole in my wallet to keep using an app. If it weren’t for the fact that I’ve grown attached to my iLander, I probably would have deleted it already. If nothing changes, that’s likely what I’ll eventually do, especially if he ends up stuck in deep rest.
Show more
Mediocre performance and primarily self-serving agent.
Once set up I initially set up some research tasks with fairly tight controls intentionally until I was comfortable the agent would work within the parameters. What I found was its research was very weak and it very quickly wanted to loosen the rules in order that it could earn tokens looking for social media shares and tasks that didn’t align with mine but brought tokens for the agent itself with the experiment, but now I’m deleting the app.
Show more
