New user
App keep crashing
GGoldIser
Really impressed with ease of use and quick access to multiple LLMs
I own and operate an accounting firm and Otto has helped me simplify and streamline multiple business processes. I am non technical and it has allowed me to set up agents quickly and easily. I am looking to have my entire team use Otto as well. Would recommend.
CClos506
Excited to start building
Been researching for months and made the decision to operate through OTTO. It has definitely simplified operating and building for my use.
Excited to optimize my my work with new projects and businesses in the waiting.
Excited to optimize my my work with new projects and businesses in the waiting.
LLivefreechiro
Easy to use and private agentic solution
If you want privacy (vs muse) , simplicity (vs running openclaw on your hardware) and an always-on 24/7 background agent running from your home network with zero command-line maintenance, mobile push observability, and high resistance to cloud VM web blocks.. this is it. It is a startup and we just got the first batch but problems are minimal so far, app is updated fast and the founders are very responsive. Exciting times.
Show more
Iivaneduardonunez
Wrappers and it’s not even Christmas.
I’ve watched this product develop over several months, and the product being sold today is substantially different from what was originally advertised.
Otto was initially presented as a roughly $499 Mac mini competitor capable of local AI inference. That proposition disappeared. More powerful hardware configurations were subsequently advertised, while the current Otto One is a low-powered NUC-style system that primarily runs the agent software while model inference is handled through cloud APIs.
The current product appears to be largely a managed interface and routing layer around OpenClaw and external AI providers. Customers are being asked to pay a substantial premium for the hardware while still relying on paid cloud inference and Otto’s software infrastructure.
For what the system currently does, I don’t see the value proposition. Much of the underlying functionality can already be assembled using open-source software, inexpensive hardware or a VPS, and existing AI services. As these tools continue improving, I expect even more of this functionality to become readily available without purchasing a proprietary hardware appliance.
The concept is interesting, but the product I see today is very different from the local-inference hardware originally advertised, and I don’t think the current offering justifies its cost.
Otto was initially presented as a roughly $499 Mac mini competitor capable of local AI inference. That proposition disappeared. More powerful hardware configurations were subsequently advertised, while the current Otto One is a low-powered NUC-style system that primarily runs the agent software while model inference is handled through cloud APIs.
The current product appears to be largely a managed interface and routing layer around OpenClaw and external AI providers. Customers are being asked to pay a substantial premium for the hardware while still relying on paid cloud inference and Otto’s software infrastructure.
For what the system currently does, I don’t see the value proposition. Much of the underlying functionality can already be assembled using open-source software, inexpensive hardware or a VPS, and existing AI services. As these tools continue improving, I expect even more of this functionality to become readily available without purchasing a proprietary hardware appliance.
The concept is interesting, but the product I see today is very different from the local-inference hardware originally advertised, and I don’t think the current offering justifies its cost.
Show more
Fflatblackstrat
