What a Tool 🫡
Finally I can remember what learnt yesterday and so on and on. 🔥😉
Now I can secretly record all my private conversations
I ramble about my feelings to my Pocket device and then feed it into chat gpt. Then we brainstorm revenge strategies.
Thank you, pocket
Ineffective if not on Premium
Casual user
Marine Veteran GUNG HO Testimony
Do not hesitate to purchase
My New Beat Friend
BEWEAR!! Devastated!!
Your product is rubbish. I do not recommend. I’ll be reporting this to ACCC and filing for compensation.
DO NOT USE POCKET!!!!
DEVASTATED!!!
HIGHLY recommend
It is easy and fun to use.
Thank you for making my life less stressful.
Work tracking
Unexpected wow!
Really nice product
Needs to work with AirPods on calls
Overall I’m glad I got it and I do use it very regularly.
Absolutely superb!
It's a SCAM
Ne marche pas
Response from developer
Bonjour Kanetons ! Désolé pour ce souci. Cela vient souvent d'un bug de synchronisation initiale. Essayez de redémarrer l'appareil et de le synchroniser avec l'application. Si vous souhaitez quand même le renvoyer, contactez-nous à hey@heypocket.com pour qu'on vous aide immédiatement ! — Victor | Pocket Support
Not great free version!
Very useful
And the support is amazing!
Disappointing product, unreliable software, and poor value for money. (Non English speaker)
Some of these hardware limitations might be addressed in future versions, but that doesn’t help customers like me who have already spent hundreds of pounds on a product that fails to deliver what was expected.
The bigger problem is the software.
If the audio isn’t captured properly in the first place, how can the software reliably analyse conversations and extract meaningful information?
In my experience, Pocket handles standard English reasonably well, sometimes achieving around 95% accuracy. However, multilingual conversations are a completely different story.
Automatic language detection frequently fails. Even when I manually select the language, the transcription accuracy can drop to approximately 60% or worse.
What makes this particularly frustrating is that when I take the same audio recording and process it through Google’s NotebookLM, the transcription can be around 95% accurate, compared with Pocket’s results, which sometimes feel like a 50/50 gamble.
This tells me that recording quality isn’t the only problem. The software’s transcription and language-processing capabilities are seriously lacking.
And this isn’t a minor inconvenience.
Pocket is supposed to help users capture conversations, understand information, generate summaries and make better decisions. But when the underlying transcript contains significant errors, the entire analysis becomes unreliable.
I cannot confidently make business decisions based on information that may have been misunderstood, incorrectly transcribed or completely misrepresented.
For a product costing hundreds of pounds, this is simply unacceptable.
I genuinely wanted this product to work. The concept is promising, but the actual experience has been deeply disappointing.
My conclusion: Pocket needs major improvements in recording quality, multilingual recognition, transcription accuracy and software reliability before I could recommend it as a dependable professional tool.
