Just Wrong Stuff
Response from developer
Thanks for the feedback! There is a bug in the explanations when facing an all-in bet postflop. It takes text from a bet/raise scenario and just replaces it with call, which doesn't make any sense. The bug has been fixed and the fix is included in the next release.
Insufficient
Response from developer
Thanks for the feedback! In our MTT ranges, 99 vs UTG open from UTG+1 is a call. In our cash-game (NL50) ranges, it’s a fold. The main reasons are rake and no ante, which make calls less profitable than in an MTT. The ranges in the app are GTO or GTO-based, so they assume tough opponents and a meaningful risk of facing 3-bets, which tightens up some preflop decisions compared to soft live games.
Helpful
Response from developer
Thank you! 🙏
Some of the decisions are questionable
Response from developer
Sorry for late response, I missed this! I don't know the exact scenario, but in GTO (game theory optimal) play, a straight is a clear call in most scenarios against an EP3 check-raise all-in on the turn, even with 3 flush cards on the board. If the opponent is playing anywhere near optimal they will have a lot of hands that are not flushes. It might however be a fold against weaker opponents who check-raise turn with a much stronger range. At the moment the gameplan is assuming competent opponents, that are playing reasonably close to GTO. In a coming update we will introduce exploitative play that takes advantage of opponents' mistakes, stay tuned!
New simulator
Response from developer
Thanks for the feedback! 🙏 I understand what you mean – seeing opponent cards can distract from pure postflop decision training and slows down the process a little bit. A toggle to not show them is a great idea and something I’m considering. Appreciate you sharing this!
