I want to play and try it before I spend money on this trial is not good
I think there should be a free month at least
Great
Great app
Unreliable solver logic
Has some pretty baffling lines. Not sure if a solver error, plugging in the lines to big name solvers there are some major discrepancies. Example: sample scenario has us on the CO with 66, we open raise (cool, no issues) SB 3bet, we 4bet (wtf), SB 5Bets, and we call. What in the world?
Recommend looking into the solver logic.
Recommend looking into the solver logic.
Show more
My subscription doesn’t show on my new iPad
Old iPad was broken and I got this new one! Signed on with same Apple ID!
Heheh
Hhh
Review
Goodapp
希望改进
希望增加中文版，不然用起来比较吃力
Can’t Cancel
There’s a 3 day trial but no way to cancel before they start charging you
good
But how about adding a Chinese version？
Please help me
I purchased the pro version yesterday,but it disappeared today
Response from developer
Have you tried restoring purchase? If it doesn't work, please email us at info@craftywheel.com and we can help you resolve this issue.
Generally, pretty good.
I think the app is very well done with regard to the exposure to an exhaustive list of post flip situations. I think the relatability to chess (intentional or not) is fantastic. Blunders and mistakes is a great way to view your decisions, as well as perfect and okay…. With that said… I don’t think there is an adequate breakdown of mistakes and blunders, meaning: what should be a mistake is often (mostly) listed as a blunder. How can a +EV decision be a blunder? If it’s the least profitable then maybe a mistake… but can’t be a blunder. Overall, I really like the app… I do feel the scoring of blunders vs mistakes needs to be reviewed.
Show more
Weird decisions
Il me propose des décisions complètement insensés que même après vérifications, restent inexpliqués . J’aurais du raise 5-2o au flop avec un KKA contre un joueur en position.. c’est n’importe quoi !
Just trial and error no explanations
This app doesn’t actually explain why you should do things it’s just trial and error still can’t understand some of the reasons for its calls.
A Disappointing GTO Trainer
I am presently using the trainer to study OUP B/SB and B/BB post-flop interactions. This is my first real engagement with GTO and have been surprised by many of its decisions. For example, it often recommends that the blind take the post-flop lead, with either a 35% or 90% bid. Is this typical for other Solvers? I don’t know.
In many of the training scenarios, the blind is given hands that it should not have, like premium pairs. These are hands that would have 3-bet the IP opponent.
On a couple of deals the app told me that the perfect bidding choice was one that was not given as an option to choose. That’s weird.
On a high percentage of hands, Button does not c-bet the flop, especially when there’s an ace on the board. Again, maybe that is just GTO but I find it curious. Again it has me wondering if this is universally true with the other Solvers.
I could go on with the list. But I will not be resubscribing next month. I cannot recommend it to my fellow poker players.
In many of the training scenarios, the blind is given hands that it should not have, like premium pairs. These are hands that would have 3-bet the IP opponent.
On a couple of deals the app told me that the perfect bidding choice was one that was not given as an option to choose. That’s weird.
On a high percentage of hands, Button does not c-bet the flop, especially when there’s an ace on the board. Again, maybe that is just GTO but I find it curious. Again it has me wondering if this is universally true with the other Solvers.
I could go on with the list. But I will not be resubscribing next month. I cannot recommend it to my fellow poker players.
Show more
Another Scam
Why isn’t there a trustworthy poker app?
Have to purchase multiple apps
You will need to purchase multiple apps in order to get Max benefit
Gas!
Fire!!
Expensive
$5.00 a week for a game is beyond ridiculous.
crazy
crazy
Terrible compared to other prominent GTO trainers
Something is wrong with the programming so it almost never recognizes things as mistakes and always recognizes any move besides the #1 most optimal move as a blunder, unless it’s the same EV as the #1 move. Teaches you bad habits because it tells you that you are doing something wrong even if you’re properly mixing it up while in indifferent spots. Will say one decision is “perfect” and the other is “ok” when both are nearly 50% and the same (highest possible) EV.
Show more
