Good app!
Response from developer
Thanks MorningJoe42. Good luck with finals!
Amazing app
Response from developer
Thank you bro.
This app is actually pretty good!
Great, great, great overall. Nice job! I started your repo it’s very nice.
Response from developer
Appreciate the star and encouraging review!
Cool!
Attachments are solid too. Would recommend. Better implemented than Quizlet even, which doesnt support images pdfs or youtube
Response from developer
Glad you're enjoying it!
Perfect study tool
Love that it supports top performing models like Gemini 2.0 and gives users granular control such as allowing BYOK, choosing between flash and pro, amount of questions, and safety settings.
Attachments are great too. It has URL, PDF, Image, and YouTube transcript — all great.
Thanks for making this, Vaibhav!
Response from developer
Much appreciated. Gemini is goated!
Very good app!
I have that I needed to get my own API key to use this app
Response from developer
Thank you for the feedback and for calling this a "Very good app!" However, I must address that obtaining an API key is a necessary step, and I’ve provided clear, detailed instructions in the onboarding, within the app, and on the GitHub README page to assist with this process. Regarding your request to export quizzes as PDF or Word documents, I’ll consider it for future updates, but the app currently delivers all functionality as described in the listing. Given your positive title and the app meeting its stated purpose, I strongly believe a 3-star rating does not reflect the experience you’ve described. I urge you to reconsider and update your rating to better align with your feedback. Thank you.
Recap AI - Promising, But Room for Improvement
However, there are some areas where Recap AI could improve. The app currently uses the Gemini model, which is somewhat underwhelming compared to more powerful options like Claude 3.5 Sonnet or an open-source model with Groq fast inference. This choice impacts the overall quality of the AI’s responses, making them feel less refined.
Additionally, there are a few functional limitations. The history button doesn’t work as expected, which can be frustrating if you’re trying to review past interactions. Another drawback is the lack of an autosuggest feature for the number of questions to generate—users are left to decide on their own, which can be a bit cumbersome.
Overall, Recap AI has a lot of potential, but it’s held back by some of its current model and functional choices. With a few updates, particularly around the AI model and user experience, it could become a much more powerful tool.
Response from developer
Hello Sir, I appreciate the review with the encouraging remarks. I understand and empathize with your concern on the model choice, as it isn’t a standard production choice, but I chose to use it because: 1. This is actually my submission for the Gemini Developer Competition. 2. I didn’t want to have users pay to use my service. I definitely will look into using Grok and integrating more powerful models, giving users granularity on quiz generation. Regarding the automatic question count decision, I definitely could add an option for that. I can see where it can be useful. On the history feature, I am slightly aware of some of the issues that users may have, but I’m not sure specifically what issue you are going through. Feel free to submit an issue on our GitHub repository with more details (there is a link in the Settings page). Again, thank you for your support, and I will definitely look into working on an update to address your concerns. Have a nice day!
