stack behaviour mismatch
both 17bx and 19bx are affected.
To reproduce:
- Switch to RPN mode
- Perform the following [1] [Enter] [2] [<-] [3]
Expected stack contents: X=3, Y=1. Actual stack contents: X=3, Y=0, Z=1.
See: P272 (Appendix E: the RPN Stack), “Clearing numbers” section of the HP 17Bii operation manual (linked in the documentation).
I suspect it shouldn’t be pushing zero to the stack, according to the documentation and original 17BII behaviour.
stack behaviour mismatch
both 17bx and 19bx are affected.
To reproduce:
- Switch to RPN mode
- Perform the following [1] [Enter] [2] [<-] [3]
Expected stack contents: X=3, Y=1. Actual stack contents: X=3, Y=0, Z=1.
See: P272 (Appendix E: the RPN Stack), “Clearing numbers” section of the HP 17Bii operation manual (linked in the documentation).
I suspect it shouldn’t be pushing zero to the stack, according to the documentation and original 17BII behaviour.
Calculations are Precise, but NOT ACCURATE.
Calculations are Precise, but NOT ACCURATE.
In the >BUSINESS>PERCENTS & MARGINS menu for example: If the [Old Value] is 41.67 and the [New Value] is 80.00, the [% Change] is 91.98, but the calculator inaccurately registers the value as 92.00.
Also in the Help section, the instruction booklet which is the exact copy of the Hewlett Packard 17Bii calculator, is not indexed with a FIND search feature.
stack behaviour mismatch
To reproduce:
- Switch to RPN mode
- Perform the following [1] [Enter] [2] [<-] [3]
Expected stack contents: X=3, Y=1. Actual stack contents: X=3, Y=0, Z=1.
See: P272 (Appendix E: the RPN Stack), “Clearing numbers” section of the HP 17Bii operation manual (linked in the documentation).
I suspect it shouldn’t be pushing zero to the stack, according to the documentation and original 17BII behaviour.
HP 17BII+
It is based on the famous HP 17BII+ calculator.
Units editor broken
The developers responded to my support request and resolved the issue with the editor. It works as intended now. Excellent and responsive support!
Unfortunately, one cannot create a conversion with reciprocal units, like L/100km to MPG. The SI value needs to be directly proportional to the Unit, not inversely proportional. Perhaps add an exponent constant in the formula to create a reciprocal?
Regardless, I increased my rating.
(Old review)
There doesn't seem to be a way to add additional unit conversions and when editing an existing, even just changing the name, it resolves to zero. The only way to fix it is to reset all units to default. That being said most of the units one would need are there. It would be nice if there was also a fuel economy conversion, but I created my own using the solver.
Units editor broken
That being said most of the units one would need are there. It would be nice if there was also a fuel economy conversion, but I created my own using the solver.
Outstanding
Doesn’t Show as Installed
Input Missing Sum
Questions
2. How does the latter differ from this new version?
3. Is there an upgrade discount?
4. Why is there no support page for questions like these?
RLM-17BX
Response from developer
We couldn't reproduce any of the miss behaviors you mentioned. Maybe yo have some Accessibility setting ON in your device. Some customers aware us about the “Button Shapes” option in the “Display & Text Size” of the “Accessibility” settings. So, open the iPhone Settings, scroll down to the “Accessibility” item and touch it. Then, touch the “Display & Text Size” item and turn OFF the “Button Shapes” switch. Anyway, contact us to support@rlmtools.com to help you in more detail
