Whoever wrote the logic for how Megan, your only option for a partner, plays needs to address some things. The AI’s throw spades at obviously wrong times, typically after the player preceding them lays a spade. Also, when the opposing team has a nil bid, the logic is buggy enough that Megan tanks the round because she throws too high, over-prioritizing throwing too high in an attempt to make the nil-bidder take a book, even when it becomes factually impossible to do so because of the cards that have already been played. When this happens, she will beat or even high-spade you while you are winning the book and she is the last to lay. Even if she can’t beat you, she will throw high instead of low, which can be a good strategy but only in the right situations. They just didn’t seem to take these situations into consideration though. There’s also an issue where both you and the other team have made their own bids and she actively tries to win the books and seems to try take the bags instead of trying to push them to the other team. Yet another issue is that when you are close to 500, with due credit of the strategist who coded this, the opponents will typically bid low in an effort to set you so they can catch up. But the problem is that much of the time, during the round they seem to forget what they are doing and then take the bags themselves. They also always try to strategically avoid throwing a king before the ace is thrown, which opens up an odd situation where even if the other team is winning and the player to throw last could and should safely win it with the king, it won’t throw it, which leads to them frequently giving books away, sometimes at the cost of getting set. This effectively makes having the queen (when you have ace and the queen combo) more powerful than the king of the same suit. Exploited another way, it can give you an advantage with the king if you throw last because the AI, itself wouldn’t do that. Yet another issue seems to be that on the first round of a nil-bid, she won’t protect you even when she can. So, she will let you win the round and lose the nil-bid, then the following round pay a card that would have protected it.
These are off the top of my head. I’m sure if I were to play it again, I’d notice other exploits that were obviously the result of poor strategy, poorly coded logic, but likely both.
Show more