Comparison

AirOTP vs M.E.L.C.

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

AirOTP

This utility app provides one-time password (OTP) authentication for enhanced security. It supports easy account registration via QR code scanning and integrates with V-FRONT for web server, VPN, and network equipment logins.

Highlights
  • OTP authentication
  • QR-code account registration
  • V-FRONT integration
  • Web server login
  • VPN login
  • Network equipment login
Features
Read full description

AirOTP is a mobile application that provides OTP authentication for V-FRONT 2 Factor Authentication Server. [ Main function ] - Easily register your account with QR-Code - OTP (One-Time Password) authentication [ Usage information ] - AirOTP is available through V-FRONT, an additional authentication enhancement solution of AirCUVE Co., Ltd. - V-FRONT implements additional authentication during the login of web server, VPN, VDI, and network equipment(Telnet). [ Access permission ] - Camera : Providing account registration through QR-Code * For more information, please check the AirCUVE Co., Ltd. website (www.aircuve.com).

About

M.E.L.C.

This tool helps aircraft engineers calculate the expiration dates for airplane defects based on minimum equipment lists. It provides a clear overview of all critical dates and allows for customization of defect categories.

Highlights
  • Calculate defect expiration dates
  • Supports categories A, B, C, D
  • View all important dates at a glance
  • Customize defect categories
Features
Read full description

M.E.L.C. is a tool for the aircraft engineers to calculate the expire date (with Category A, B, C and D) of defected airplanes in accordance with the minimum equipment list. With one quick view all important dates are visible. And a function to customize all categories.

Screenshots

AirOTP4 screens
M.E.L.C.4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: M.E.L.C. at 75% against AirOTP's 25%. AirOTP's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 1) and update cadence (every 8 days vs every 18 months). On price, ads, monetization model and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. M.E.L.C. sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. AirOTP asks for nothing beyond the download.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

AirOTP ships an update every 8 days, M.E.L.C. every 18 months. The most recent releases landed on October 2, 2026 and October 6, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
AirOTP versus M.E.L.C.: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterAirOTPM.E.L.C.
PriceFreeFree
Rating—5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews25.0% of reviews75.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings—1 — better
Update frequencyEvery 8 days — betterEvery 18 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod, Apple Watch — better
Requires iOS9.0 — better13.0
Further details — not scored
Size10 MB6 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperAirCUVE Inc.Janko Enke

Customer experience

AirOTP

Written reviews4 reviews
Positive25.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative75.0%

M.E.L.C.

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive75.0%
Neutral25.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

AirOTP

No in-app purchases

1 purchases

M.E.L.C.

One-time1
  • Full version$0.99

Questions

Is AirOTP free?
AirOTP is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is M.E.L.C. free?
M.E.L.C. is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Do AirOTP or M.E.L.C. have ads?
Neither AirOTP nor M.E.L.C. shows ads.
Which is updated more often, AirOTP or M.E.L.C.?
AirOTP ships an update every 8 days, and M.E.L.C. every 18 months. Most recently, AirOTP was updated on October 2, 2026 and M.E.L.C. on October 6, 2026.

Other comparisons