Comparison

城家公寓 vs Smart Energy System

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

城家公寓

Features
Read full description

城家公寓,安心租房选城家。 城家,由华住酒店集团和IDG资本投资创建。 精心为漂泊的年轻人准备了独立有品质、像家一样的生活空间。 让年轻人追寻自由的脚步不因高昂的房价而却步,不用为住而焦虑。 城家布局全国,拥有高品质公寓、国内精选民宿、城市优质民居等多种租住形态。独立舒适空间均配备洗衣、厨房、卫浴等生活功能,满足城市长住、差旅短住、家庭出游、异地就医、外地考学等长短期居住需求。 城家-周租月租年租,无中介拎包入住,找房首选。

About

Smart Energy System

This cloud-based system allows for remote monitoring and management of energy usage. It offers secure communication and automated protection features, with free software and support.

Highlights
  • Cloud-based access
  • Remote reading and recharging
  • Secure communication
  • Automated switching
  • Overload protection
  • Open cover detection
Features
Read full description

System USPs 1. Cloud solution; access whenever wherever. 2. Remote read and recharge. 3. Secure communication due to additional hardware encryption and E-bank technology. 4. Free cloud software and technical support. Product USPs 1. SIMT IEC62052-11;62052-21 type approved certificate. 2. Unique security key in each meter for high protection. 3. Internal relay to switch off automatically when balance is zero or when cracking is detected. 4. Overload protection. 5. Open cover detection.

Screenshots

城家公寓4 screens
Smart Energy System4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 城家公寓 at 1.7 against Smart Energy System's 1.0. 城家公寓 also leads on ads (none vs shown). Smart Energy System's advantage is iOS requirement (11 vs 13.0). On price, review sentiment, ratings volume and update cadence there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

城家公寓 holds the better App Store score, 1.7 against 1.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 3 and 3 respectively. Written reviews split almost evenly too, at 0% and 0% positive.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

城家公寓 ships an update every 6 weeks, Smart Energy System every 5 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 9, 2026 and September 28, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
城家公寓 versus Smart Energy System: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter城家公寓Smart Energy System
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.7 (3 ratings) — better1.0 (3 ratings)
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews0.0% of reviews
Number of ratings33
Update frequencyEvery 6 weeksEvery 5 weeks — better
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
Monetization—Ad-supported
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS13.011 — better
Further details — not scored
Size58 MB28 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer上海城家时代科技有限公司Jiaxing Zhidian Ecological Technology Co., Ltd.

Customer experience

城家公寓

All ratings3 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral33.3%
Negative66.7%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

Smart Energy System

All ratings3 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%
Written reviews2 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

In-app purchases

None

城家公寓

No in-app purchases

None

Smart Energy System

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 城家公寓 free?
城家公寓 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Smart Energy System free?
Smart Energy System is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 城家公寓 or Smart Energy System?
城家公寓 is rated higher. 城家公寓 averages 1.7 out of 5 from 3 ratings, while Smart Energy System averages 1.0 from 3 ratings.
Do 城家公寓 or Smart Energy System have ads?
Smart Energy System shows ads; 城家公寓 does not.
Which is updated more often, 城家公寓 or Smart Energy System?
城家公寓 ships an update every 6 weeks, and Smart Energy System every 5 weeks. Most recently, 城家公寓 was updated on October 9, 2026 and Smart Energy System on September 28, 2026.

Other comparisons