Comparison

CO2 Modeller vs Atmospheric Model

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

CO2 Modeller

Simulate the impact of reducing carbon emissions on climate change. This app generates projections for atmospheric CO2 concentration, global warming, sea level rise, and ocean acidification.

Highlights
  • Model carbon emission reductions
  • Simulate climate change effects
  • Project CO2 concentration
  • Estimate global warming
  • Predict sea level rise
  • Analyze ocean acidification
Features
Read full description

Model the effect of carbon emissions reductions on climate change using your smartphone or tablet. CO2 Modeller uses a streamlined computationally efficient Earth system model to simulate the effect of carbon emissions reductions on climate change. It generates twenty-first century projections of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and global averages of surface warming, sea level rise and ocean acidification.

About

Atmospheric Model

Explore planetary atmospheres with a radiative transfer model. Calculate emission temperatures and flux densities, then modify parameters like albedo and solar constant to simulate atmospheric changes and their effects on climate.

Highlights
  • Radiative transfer model for planetary atmospheres
  • Calculates emission temperature and flux densities
  • Adjustable parameters: albedo, distance from sun, extinction coefficients
  • Supports 9 solar system planets or custom planets
  • Generates flux diagrams of incoming and outgoing radiation
  • Saves and compares two model run results
  • Exports data to CSV for spreadsheet analysis
Features
Read full description

The app uses a simple radiative transfer model for a planet with two leaky* atmospheric layers. It begins by calculating Te, the emission temperature of the planet by using the Solar constant and planetary Albedo. Te is called the Blackbody temperature because it is inferred by fitting a Blackbody curve to the observed outbound LWIR radiation. You can choose any of the 9 planets in our solar system, or choose one of your own making. The app then uses 5 parameters for the chosen “base” planet: the Albedo (alpha), distance from the sun (r), extinction coefficients of two atmospheric layers (epsilon1, 2), and the solar constant S0 to calculate temperatures and radiative flux densities. One can modify these 5 adjustable parameters from their base values, and update the result. A flux diagram is generated showing the incoming short wavelength (SW), and outgoing long wavelength (LW) radiation. Two model run results can be saved and differences displayed. Also, runs can be saved to a .csv file for E-mail export and spreadsheet analysis. Calculate the “natural” 33K greenhouse effect (compare Earth with and without an atmosphere), or change the extinction coefficients to see the effect of adding or reducing absorbing gasses. Predict what Mars might be like with an atmosphere, or see what would happen if the characteristics of our sun, albedo or planetary orbit change. This simple model can create hours of fun. The base parameter values for Earth nicely calculate Ts, Te, and T1 (upper troposphere) values, and the model correctly predicts Te’s for all the planets. INSTRUCTIONS: Load app, choose a “base” planet, segue with Update. Click Update to calculate the temperatures and flux densities. Segue to inspect the flux densities, and/or modify the base parameters to see changes. Save and compare differences in 2 runs. (C/C0) values are in CO2 equivalents. Save runs to .csv file for spreadsheet analysis. USAGE TIPS: Start with a base planet, but realize this simple 2 layer model cannot accurately predict the surface temperatures of the gas giants or Venus. Pressing the Back button allows you to refresh your parameter or base planet choices. Remember a 5 K change in Ts resulted in the Earth’s last Ice Age! For convenience, the Test planet can be used to create your own set of parameters without entering a planet name. Increasing the solar constant increases all temperatures. Increasing epsilon does nothing to Te, which depends only on S0, r, and alpha. Press On/Off & Home takes flux diagram screenshot. It is easy to remove a saved data file run (row) after import to spreadsheet. RADIATIVE FORCING and CLIMATE SENSITIVITY: Radiative forcing (dF) can be used to estimate the change in surface temperature (dTs) arising from that forcing using: dTs = lambda x dF, where lambda is the Climate Sensitivity in K / (W/m2). Forcing due to an atmospheric greenhouse gas such as CO2 can be expressed as: dF (in W/m2) = 5.35 × ln (C/C0), where C is the CO2 concentration [CO2] and C0 is the initial concentration (in ppm). For a single atmospheric layer Earth, changing the base value of epsilon = 0.78 to epsilon = 0.83 (d-epsilon = 0.05) gives an 3K T rise; roughly the equivalent of doubling [CO2] (and a forcing of 3.71 W/m2). There has been a [CO2] increase between the years 1750 (280 ppm) and 2000 (380 ppm). Thus dF = 5.35 x ln (370/280) = 1.5 W/m2. dTs = lambda x dF = 0.8 (K/(W/m2)) x 1.5 (W/m2) = 1.2 K over that timeframe (d-epsilon 0.02 used). * Leaky implies epsilon less than 1.

Screenshots

CO2 Modeller4 screens
Atmospheric Model4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Atmospheric Model at 5.0 against CO2 Modeller's 2.5. Atmospheric Model also leads on review sentiment (100% vs 75%). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Atmospheric Model holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 2.5. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 1 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 75% of CO2 Modeller's written reviews are positive against 100% of Atmospheric Model's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 36 months. The most recent releases landed on October 2, 2026 and September 23, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
CO2 Modeller versus Atmospheric Model: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterCO2 ModellerAtmospheric Model
PriceFreeFree
Rating2.5 (2 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews75.0% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings2 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 36 monthsEvery 36 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS12.112.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size9 MB12 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperAlex RogersRichard Loda

Customer experience

CO2 Modeller

All ratings2 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive75.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative25.0%

Atmospheric Model

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

CO2 Modeller

No in-app purchases

None

Atmospheric Model

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is CO2 Modeller free?
CO2 Modeller is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Atmospheric Model free?
Atmospheric Model is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, CO2 Modeller or Atmospheric Model?
Atmospheric Model is rated higher. CO2 Modeller averages 2.5 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while Atmospheric Model averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do CO2 Modeller or Atmospheric Model have ads?
Neither CO2 Modeller nor Atmospheric Model shows ads.
Which is updated more often, CO2 Modeller or Atmospheric Model?
CO2 Modeller ships an update every 36 months, and Atmospheric Model every 36 months. Most recently, CO2 Modeller was updated on October 2, 2026 and Atmospheric Model on September 23, 2026.

Other comparisons