Comparison

见缝插针2 vs 划线火柴人

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

见缝插针2

A simple yet thrilling game where players tap to insert small balls into a rotating circle without collision. It tests your hand-eye coordination and quick reflexes across challenging levels. Compete with friends worldwide in this addictive entertainment experience.

Highlights
  • Simple tap-to-play mechanics
  • Avoid ball collisions
  • Challenging levels
  • Test observation skills
  • Fast reaction challenges
  • Global leaderboards
Features
Read full description

升级啦!与众不同的玩法,加入最新的创意,关卡更具挑战性。 见缝插针是一款非常简单的游戏,点击插入小球,不要让小球碰撞,就这么简单,但处处充满惊险与惊喜,简单好玩刺激,等你来挑战! 手眼大脑完美配合,挑战你的观察力,快速反应能力. 游戏特色: - 点击即可游戏 - 不要让小球碰撞 - 你能挑战到底吗? - 与全世界的好友竞技 温馨提示:此游戏容易上瘾,玩的时间长了记得休息一会儿哟!

About

划线火柴人

Draw any shape with your finger to solve physics puzzles and save the stickman. The game features a simple hand-drawn art style and increasingly challenging levels. Enjoy unique solutions and a fun, brain-teasing experience.

Highlights
  • Physics-based puzzles
  • Freehand drawing mechanics
  • Single-player offline mode
  • Hand-drawn art style
  • Progressively challenging levels
  • Creative problem-solving
Features
Read full description

物理解谜,用手指画出任意形状,救救火柴人! 画线完成后,保持3秒内火柴人不受伤就可以安全通过关卡。 特色: -单机模式,随时随地都能玩一局 -简笔画手绘风格,Q萌有趣又魔性 -关卡设定乐趣十足,难度逐渐增加 -脑洞大开的通关方式,打破思维固式 -简单操作,手指画线即可大小朋友都能玩 这个游戏最大的乐趣在于答案并不唯一,只要可以达到目的,画出任意形状都可以!快来发挥你的聪明才智救救火柴人吧!

Screenshots

见缝插针23 screens
划线火柴人4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: 见缝插针2 at 70% against 划线火柴人's 0%. 见缝插针2 also leads on rating (4.6 vs 3.2) and ratings volume (48 vs 13). 划线火柴人's advantage is update cadence (fortnightly vs every 24 months). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

见缝插针2 holds the better App Store score, 4.6 against 3.2. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 48 and 13 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 70% of 见缝插针2's written reviews are positive against 0% of 划线火柴人's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

见缝插针2 ships an update every 24 months, 划线火柴人 fortnightly. The most recent releases landed on August 20, 2026 and June 7, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
见缝插针2 versus 划线火柴人: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter见缝插针2划线火柴人
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.6 (48 ratings) — better3.2 (13 ratings)
Positive reviews70.4% of reviews — better0.0% of reviews
Number of ratings48 — better13
Update frequencyEvery 24 monthsFortnightly — better
AdsYesYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationAd-supportedAd-supported
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS10.010.0
Further details — not scored
Size37 MB35 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer赛雷 库祥可 王

Customer experience

见缝插针2

All ratings48 ratings
Positive87.5%
Neutral4.2%
Negative8.3%
Written reviews27 reviews
Positive70.4%
Neutral3.7%
Negative25.9%

划线火柴人

All ratings13 ratings
Positive53.8%
Neutral0.0%
Negative46.2%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

In-app purchases

None

见缝插针2

No in-app purchases

None

划线火柴人

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 见缝插针2 free?
见缝插针2 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 划线火柴人 free?
划线火柴人 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 见缝插针2 or 划线火柴人?
见缝插针2 is rated higher. 见缝插针2 averages 4.6 out of 5 from 48 ratings, while 划线火柴人 averages 3.2 from 13 ratings.
Do 见缝插针2 or 划线火柴人 have ads?
Both 见缝插针2 and 划线火柴人 show ads.
Which is updated more often, 见缝插针2 or 划线火柴人?
见缝插针2 ships an update every 24 months, and 划线火柴人 fortnightly. Most recently, 见缝插针2 was updated on August 20, 2026 and 划线火柴人 on June 7, 2026.

Other comparisons