Comparison

Retro Lunar Lander vs Retro Cloud Player

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both games, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Retro Lunar Lander

Pilot a lunar module to a safe landing on a pad, avoiding hazards like moving platforms, meteor showers, and black holes. This 8-bit arcade game offers 18 levels of challenging, retro-style gameplay.

Highlights
  • Lunar module landing simulation
  • Challenging levels with obstacles
  • Meteor showers and black holes
  • 8-bit retro arcade style
  • 18 levels of gameplay
Features
Read full description

It doesn't get much simpler than this: land the Lunar Module on the landing pad (but not too fast!) and all is well. But then it does get a little bit harder: moving platforms, meteor showers, and even black holes can start to make it get a little crazier. Eighteen levels should give you half an hour of entertainment. It's 8-bit style arcade action, suitable for anyone who remembers what a video arcade was like, and likes the color green.

About

Retro Cloud Player

Play classic games on your Apple devices with this emulator. It utilizes iCloud for ROM storage and requires a companion app for collection management. A gamepad or keyboard is necessary for gameplay.

Highlights
  • Legacy gaming emulation
  • iCloud ROM storage
  • Libretro cores integration
  • Companion app for ROM management
  • Gamepad/keyboard support
Features
Read full description

The Retro Cloud Player is an emulator for legacy gaming systems. The ROMs are stored in iCloud. The Retro Cloud Companion app is needed in order to manage your collection of ROMs. A gamepad or keyboard is also required. This emulator include cores from the Libretro project.

Screenshots

Retro Lunar Lander4 screens
Retro Cloud Player1 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Retro Cloud Player at 5.0 against Retro Lunar Lander's 2.5. Retro Lunar Lander's advantage is ratings volume (4 vs 1) and iOS requirement (15.0 vs 18.0). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Retro Cloud Player holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 2.5. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 4 and 1 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Retro Lunar Lander versus Retro Cloud Player: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterRetro Lunar LanderRetro Cloud Player
PriceFreeFree
Rating2.5 (4 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews50.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings4 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 124 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPod, Apple TViPhone, iPad, Apple TV
Requires iOS15.0 — better18.0
Further details — not scored
Size15 MB70 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperJohn KennedyJulien Eyriès

Customer experience

Retro Lunar Lander

All ratings4 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%

Retro Cloud Player

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Retro Lunar Lander

No in-app purchases

None

Retro Cloud Player

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Retro Lunar Lander free?
Retro Lunar Lander is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Retro Cloud Player free?
Retro Cloud Player is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Retro Lunar Lander or Retro Cloud Player?
Retro Cloud Player is rated higher. Retro Lunar Lander averages 2.5 out of 5 from 4 ratings, while Retro Cloud Player averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do Retro Lunar Lander or Retro Cloud Player have ads?
Neither Retro Lunar Lander nor Retro Cloud Player shows ads.

Other comparisons