Comparison

宠物连连看 vs 四川麻将·单机

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both games, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

宠物连连看

Experience a classic matching puzzle game with a fresh take. Enjoy elegant graphics, smooth gameplay, and multiple modes including classic, timed, and endless challenges. With hundreds of levels and helpful items, this game offers endless fun.

Highlights
  • Elegant graphics
  • Smooth operation experience
  • 32 movement types
  • Four game modes
  • Over 500 levels
  • Three types of props
  • Game Center support
Features
Read full description

电脑上最正版的连连看游戏?免费下载,赶紧来吧! 清新优雅的画面 - 全新的玩法 - 最流畅平滑的操作体验! - 32种移动方式。 - 四大模式 - 经典模式:经典传统的玩法,向历史致敬! - 争分夺秒:生死时速,坚持到最后的都是英雄。 - 无限模式:挑战连连看究级王者! - 梦魇竞赛:刺激有趣 - 多达500关 - 三种道具供你使用 - Game Center支持 - 四大排行版 爱玩连连看的亲们,惊喜不容错过!

About

四川麻将·单机

Features
Read full description

这是一款单机版的四川麻将,其核心是打缺门,刮风下雨,计番,血战到底,流局查叫,画面精美,加入动画与音效,摆脱必须联网的烦恼,是闲暇时间娱乐的好选择。

Screenshots

宠物连连看4 screens
四川麻将·单机4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 宠物连连看 at 4.7 against 四川麻将·单机's 2.5. 宠物连连看 also leads on ratings volume (1.4K vs 2). 四川麻将·单机's advantage is update cadence (every 8 months vs every 18 months) and review sentiment (100% vs 90%). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

宠物连连看 holds the better App Store score, 4.7 against 2.5. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 宠物连连看 has 1.4K ratings behind it against 2, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews complicate that: 90% of 宠物连连看's written reviews are positive against 100% of 四川麻将·单机's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

宠物连连看 ships an update every 18 months, 四川麻将·单机 every 8 months. The most recent releases landed on November 11, 2026 and November 2, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
宠物连连看 versus 四川麻将·单机: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter宠物连连看四川麻将·单机
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.7 (1.4K ratings) — better2.5 (2 ratings)
Positive reviews89.6% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings1.4K — better2
Update frequencyEvery 18 monthsEvery 8 months — better
AdsYesYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationAd-supported—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS13.012.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size16 MB101 MB
Age rating17+17+
Developerzhigang qiJinhua Kairui Software Co., Ltd.

Customer experience

宠物连连看

All ratings1,351 ratings
Positive92.2%
Neutral4.1%
Negative3.7%
Written reviews106 reviews
Positive89.6%
Neutral2.8%
Negative7.5%

四川麻将·单机

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%
Written reviews2 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Bugs and requests

宠物连连看

Reported bugs

2 issues
  • Difficulty progression issues
  • Inability to advance past certain levels

Requested features

2 requests
  • Reduce ad frequency
  • Improve difficulty scaling

四川麻将·单机

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

In-app purchases

None

宠物连连看

No in-app purchases

None

四川麻将·单机

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 宠物连连看 free?
宠物连连看 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 四川麻将·单机 free?
四川麻将·单机 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 宠物连连看 or 四川麻将·单机?
宠物连连看 is rated higher. 宠物连连看 averages 4.7 out of 5 from 1.4K ratings, while 四川麻将·单机 averages 2.5 from 2 ratings.
Do 宠物连连看 or 四川麻将·单机 have ads?
Both 宠物连连看 and 四川麻将·单机 show ads.
Which is updated more often, 宠物连连看 or 四川麻将·单机?
宠物连连看 ships an update every 18 months, and 四川麻将·单机 every 8 months. Most recently, 宠物连连看 was updated on November 11, 2026 and 四川麻将·单机 on November 2, 2026.

Other comparisons