Comparison

掌门1对1辅导HD vs 学而思1对1

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

掌门1对1辅导HD

This platform offers interactive live classes and diverse educational services focused on improving user knowledge and abilities. It leverages smart technology for a convenient and engaging online learning experience, driving personalized education.

Highlights
  • 1-on-1 interactive live classes
  • Quality education platform
  • Parental classroom access
  • Ability enhancement services
  • Systematic and efficient training
  • Smart technology integration
Read full description

1对1互动直播课、素质教育平台 掌门一对一,提供家长课堂和能力提升等多元化的智能素质教育服务。通过系统化和高效的培养,全面提升用户的知识和能力。掌门一对一借助智能技术,提供便捷、有趣的在线学习体验。以科技驱动个性化教育,致力于让每一位学习者都能享有高品质的教育。

About

学而思1对1

This app provides personalized 1-on-1 education services for K-12 students, including local and online classes, and English literacy courses. It focuses on fostering active learning habits and uses an intelligent system to create tailored educational plans for each child.

Highlights
  • 1-on-1 local and online classes
  • English literacy courses
  • Personalized learning solutions
  • Intelligent teaching system
  • Data-driven progress tracking
  • Focus on active learning habits
Features
Read full description

“学而思1对1”是学而思旗下聚焦中小学个性化教育高端品牌,为孩子提供1对1本地课堂、1对1在线课和新外教英语素养教育课等教育服务。 自2007 年成立以来,学而思1对1始终以“爱和科技让教育更美好 ”为使命,秉持“激发动力,培养能力”的教育理念,根据4-18岁孩子的自身特点,定制专属的学习解决方案。 学而思1对1业务覆盖全国387个城市,累积服务学员超过250,000 名。 学而思1对1品牌理念聚焦为帮助孩子口、手、脑积极联动,并养成“愿表达,勤动笔,善总结”的良好学习习惯,真正地为孩子构建高频互动、高度关注、快速进步的掌握式学习课堂。依托自主研发的“i 进步”智能教学系统对学习流程进行重构,通过模块化知识点,智能化课后练习,数据化学习结果,大数据全程记录与预测学习轨迹,真正做到科学地为学生定制个性化教育方案,用专业的师资团队和过硬的技术实力,深挖和激发每个孩子的潜能,实现更高效地学习,不断践行“让进步看得见”的承诺。

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 学而思1对1 at 4.0 against 掌门1对1辅导HD's 2.7. On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

学而思1对1 holds the better App Store score, 4.0 against 2.7. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 12 and 8 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

掌门1对1辅导HD ships an update every 6 weeks, 学而思1对1 every 3 weeks. The most recent releases landed on June 21, 2026 and June 1, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard1 real difference · 9 level
掌门1对1辅导HD versus 学而思1对1: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter掌门1对1辅导HD学而思1对1
PriceFreeFree
Rating2.7 (12 ratings)4.0 (8 ratings) — better
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings12 — better8
Update frequencyEvery 6 weeksEvery 3 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPadiPad
Requires iOS9.0 — better10.0
Further details — not scored
Size316 MB82 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperShanghai ZhangXiaoMen Education Technology Co., LtdBeijing Huanqiu ZhiKang Shidai Education Consulting Co.,Ltd

Customer experience

掌门1对1辅导HD

All ratings12 ratings
Positive41.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative58.3%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

学而思1对1

All ratings8 ratings
Positive75.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative25.0%

In-app purchases

None

掌门1对1辅导HD

No in-app purchases

None

学而思1对1

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 掌门1对1辅导HD free?
掌门1对1辅导HD is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 学而思1对1 free?
学而思1对1 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 掌门1对1辅导HD or 学而思1对1?
学而思1对1 is rated higher. 掌门1对1辅导HD averages 2.7 out of 5 from 12 ratings, while 学而思1对1 averages 4.0 from 8 ratings.
Do 掌门1对1辅导HD or 学而思1对1 have ads?
Neither 掌门1对1辅导HD nor 学而思1对1 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 掌门1对1辅导HD or 学而思1对1?
掌门1对1辅导HD ships an update every 6 weeks, and 学而思1对1 every 3 weeks. Most recently, 掌门1对1辅导HD was updated on June 21, 2026 and 学而思1对1 on June 1, 2026.

Other comparisons