Comparison

Ashvins Authenticator vs MPI Mobile App

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Ashvins Authenticator

This app supports users in maintaining and monitoring specific software. It is designed for users of Ashvins/Heyex software to manage their systems.

Highlights
  • Software maintenance
  • System monitoring
  • Service-user support
  • Ashvins/Heyex software integration
Features
Read full description

Ashvins Authenticator is an app used by Service-users for the maintenance and monitoring of our Ashvins/Heyex software.

About

MPI Mobile App

This app offers a quick guide to benefits for participants of the Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health Plans. It provides essential information for members to understand their coverage and entitlements.

Highlights
  • Benefit guide access
  • Participant information
  • Health plan details
  • Pension plan details
Features
Read full description

The MPI App is designed to provide a quick guide to benefits for participants of the Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health Plans.

Screenshots

Ashvins Authenticator3 screens
MPI Mobile App4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: MPI Mobile App at 2.4 against Ashvins Authenticator's 2.0. MPI Mobile App also leads on ratings volume (28 vs 1). Ashvins Authenticator's advantage is update cadence (monthly vs every 2 months). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

MPI Mobile App holds the better App Store score, 2.4 against 2.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: MPI Mobile App has 28 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Ashvins Authenticator ships an update monthly, MPI Mobile App every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 4, 2026 and October 6, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Ashvins Authenticator versus MPI Mobile App: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterAshvins AuthenticatorMPI Mobile App
PriceFreeFree
Rating2.0 (1 ratings)2.4 (28 ratings) — better
Positive reviews—0.0% of reviews
Number of ratings128 — better
Update frequencyMonthly — betterEvery 2 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS11.011.0
Further details — not scored
Size57 MB74 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperMedicalCommunications Soft- und Hardware GmbHMOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN

Customer experience

Ashvins Authenticator

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

MPI Mobile App

All ratings24 ratings
Positive33.3%
Neutral8.3%
Negative58.3%
Written reviews11 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral9.1%
Negative90.9%

In-app purchases

None

Ashvins Authenticator

No in-app purchases

None

MPI Mobile App

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Ashvins Authenticator free?
Ashvins Authenticator is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is MPI Mobile App free?
MPI Mobile App is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Ashvins Authenticator or MPI Mobile App?
MPI Mobile App is rated higher. Ashvins Authenticator averages 2.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while MPI Mobile App averages 2.4 from 28 ratings.
Do Ashvins Authenticator or MPI Mobile App have ads?
Neither Ashvins Authenticator nor MPI Mobile App shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Ashvins Authenticator or MPI Mobile App?
Ashvins Authenticator ships an update monthly, and MPI Mobile App every 2 months. Most recently, Ashvins Authenticator was updated on October 4, 2026 and MPI Mobile App on October 6, 2026.

Other comparisons