Comparison

新乐山 vs 富顺生活

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

新乐山

Features
Read full description

新乐山是新乐山网(www.xinleshan.com)旗下移动客户端。 新乐山网是乐山最具影响力的本地生活消费互动服务平台之一,致力于为用户提供便捷的本地生活服务。 新乐山客户端是一款集互动、资讯、服务为一体的移动互联平台,用户可以了解乐山最新动态,可以加入感兴趣的社区,选择自己喜欢的内容或参加同城活动。 【联系方式】 您可以在微信上搜索“xinleshan”关注我们的公众号,获取最新资讯及活动! 您还可以拨打0833-2133363或者发邮件到admin@xinleshan.com联系我们! 【声明】 新乐山网举办的同城活动,所有奖品由本公司承担,与苹果公司无关!

About

富顺生活

Read full description

富顺生活,只为富顺人服务的APP,在富顺,我们更专业! >>美食外卖:网罗富顺本地美食外卖,各种满减折扣新客立减活动不断,用户可预约订餐,订单状态及时通知,准时送达。 >>跑腿代购:用户便捷下单,骑手快速响应接单,两小时内送达富顺全城,帮买帮送,排队代办,送鲜花蛋糕,买美食。 >>便民黄页:超市百货,二手维修,家居建材,酒店住宿,快递物流,生活服务,休闲娱乐等富顺信息,轻松获取,高速浏览,一键拨号。 >>富顺生活,快来体验便捷优质的本地服务吧!

Screenshots

新乐山3 screens
富顺生活4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: 富顺生活 at none against 新乐山's shown. 富顺生活 also leads on iOS requirement (9.0 vs 13.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences · 4 level
新乐山 versus 富顺生活: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter新乐山富顺生活
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 2 months—
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS13.09.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size112 MB162 MB
Age rating12+9+
DeveloperSichuan ZhongShang Technology Co., Ltd.Baiyin Woniu Network Technology Service Co., Ltd.

In-app purchases

None

新乐山

No in-app purchases

None

富顺生活

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 新乐山 free?
新乐山 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 富顺生活 free?
富顺生活 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do 新乐山 or 富顺生活 have ads?
新乐山 shows ads; 富顺生活 does not.

Other comparisons