Comparison

XJ_endoscope vs Mo

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

XJ_endoscope

This software enables nondestructive testing by capturing internal images and videos of devices without disassembly. It supports multiple languages and allows for adjustable image parameters, picture shooting, and video recording.

Highlights
  • Nondestructive testing
  • Image and video capture
  • Adjustable image parameters
  • Multi-language support
  • Picture sharing
Features
Read full description

XJ_endoscope  is a type of software for endoscope industry, which is mainly used in industrial endoscope inspection, medical examination and so on. Without disassembling or destroying the devices, pictures and videos of device internal inspection can be acquired, thus realizing nondestructive testing. 

 Software Functions: 1. Support seven languages including Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, English, Japanese, French, German and Spanish. 2. Image brightness, contrast and other parameters are adjustable. 3. It has functions of picture shooting and video recording. 4. It has sharing function. Pictures and videos can be shared with friends through social contact software.

About

Mo

Connect your device to WiFi-enabled cameras for real-time image and video transmission. Ideal for a variety of applications including aerial photography, monitoring, and industrial inspections.

Highlights
  • WiFi image transmission
  • Connects to camera via WiFi
  • Real-time image and video transfer
  • Supports iOS devices
  • Non-destructive testing
  • Wireless reversing camera functionality
Features
Read full description

Mo-View application software, is a combination of WiFi image transmission equipment using the software, with WiFi settings to achieve the camera through wireless WiFi and IOS system terminal equipment connection of application software, allows users to truly achieve anytime, anywhere, free wireless transmission of image data. WiFi wireless image transmission is mainly used for toys, aerial photography, monitoring, piping, industrial endoscope mirror detection, medical testing, wireless reversing camera, etc., in does not need to be disassembled or damaged assembly and equipment to stop running to achieve non-destructive testing. To achieve internal detection or graph transfer pictures, video.

Screenshots

XJ_endoscope2 screens
Mo4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Mo at 2.5 against XJ_endoscope's 1.8. Mo also leads on review sentiment (27% vs 0%) and ratings volume (71 vs 16). XJ_endoscope's advantage is iOS requirement (8.0 vs 12.0). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Mo holds the better App Store score, 2.5 against 1.8. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 16 and 71 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 0% of XJ_endoscope's written reviews are positive against 27% of Mo's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

XJ_endoscope ships an update every 2 weeks, Mo fortnightly. Both last shipped on October 24, 2026.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
XJ_endoscope versus Mo: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterXJ_endoscopeMo
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.8 (16 ratings)2.5 (71 ratings) — better
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews26.5% of reviews — better
Number of ratings1671 — better
Update frequencyEvery 2 weeksFortnightly — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS8.0 — better12.0
Further details — not scored
Size39 MB4 MB
Age rating12+4+
Developer辉荣 林Shenzhen MoLian Technology Co., Ltd.

Customer experience

XJ_endoscope

All ratings14 ratings
Positive7.1%
Neutral21.4%
Negative71.4%
Written reviews11 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral9.1%
Negative90.9%

Mo

All ratings71 ratings
Positive33.8%
Neutral11.3%
Negative54.9%
Written reviews49 reviews
Positive26.5%
Neutral6.1%
Negative67.3%

Bugs and requests

XJ_endoscope

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

Mo

Reported bugs

13 issues
  • Blank screen/no image
  • WiFi connection issues
  • App crashes or freezes
  • Fails to connect to endoscope
  • SSID input errors (special characters)
Show 8 more
  • TIPS set fail error message
  • App not showing in device settings
  • Cannot change resolution
  • Camera preview is black
  • No image capture
  • App doesn't work with specific hardware
  • Cannot link to camera
  • App doesn't register on phone for permissions

Requested features

6 requests
  • Provide clear setup instructions
  • Improve customer support
  • Fix compatibility issues with newer iOS versions
  • Allow input of special characters in SSID
  • Enable image saving and sharing
Show 1 more
  • Provide clear instructions on how to turn on lights

In-app purchases

None

XJ_endoscope

No in-app purchases

None

Mo

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is XJ_endoscope free?
XJ_endoscope is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Mo free?
Mo is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, XJ_endoscope or Mo?
Mo is rated higher. XJ_endoscope averages 1.8 out of 5 from 16 ratings, while Mo averages 2.5 from 71 ratings.
Do XJ_endoscope or Mo have ads?
Neither XJ_endoscope nor Mo shows ads.
Which is updated more often, XJ_endoscope or Mo?
XJ_endoscope ships an update every 2 weeks, and Mo fortnightly. Most recently, XJ_endoscope was updated on October 24, 2026 and Mo on October 24, 2026.

Other comparisons