Comparison

Inside Beauty vs M·A·C X

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Inside Beauty

An educational tool for staff to learn about company products and culture. Access information anytime, anywhere to enhance product knowledge and understanding of the organization's values.

Highlights
  • Product information access
  • Company culture learning
  • On-demand learning
  • Staff-focused content
  • Mobile accessibility
Features
Read full description

This application is dedicated to our staff. Learn about our products and culture where and whenever you want.

About

M·A·C X

This app provides a learning community and exclusive content for M·A·C employees and authorized retailers. It helps users build skills in artistry, service, social media, and product knowledge, while connecting with other M·A·C Artists globally.

Highlights
  • Exclusive behind-the-scenes information
  • Build artistry skills
  • Enhance service knowledge
  • Improve social media skills
  • Deepen product knowledge
  • Connect with global M·A·C Artists
Features
Read full description

FOR M·A·C EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYEES OF M·A·C-AUTHORIZED RETAILERS M·A·C X is a lifestyle and learning community for M·A·C Artists to: - Find exclusive, behind-the-scenes and insider information - Build artistry, service, social media and product knowledge skills - Connect to and learn from M·A·C Artists all over the world

Screenshots

Inside Beauty4 screens
M·A·C X4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: M·A·C X at 3.8 against Inside Beauty's 3.5. M·A·C X also leads on update cadence (every 3 weeks vs every 2 months). Inside Beauty's advantage is iOS requirement (13.0 vs 15.1). On price, ratings volume, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

M·A·C X holds the better App Store score, 3.8 against 3.5. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 23 and 16 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Inside Beauty ships an update every 2 months, M·A·C X every 3 weeks. The most recent releases landed on September 3, 2026 and September 14, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Inside Beauty versus M·A·C X: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterInside BeautyM·A·C X
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.5 (23 ratings)3.8 (16 ratings) — better
Positive reviews28.6% of reviews—
Number of ratings23 — better16
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsEvery 3 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS13.0 — better15.1
Further details — not scored
Size142 MB44 MB
Age rating12+17+
DeveloperPARTROISThe Estee Lauder Companies Inc.

Customer experience

Inside Beauty

All ratings23 ratings
Positive60.9%
Neutral4.3%
Negative34.8%
Written reviews7 reviews
Positive28.6%
Neutral0.0%
Negative71.4%

M·A·C X

All ratings15 ratings
Positive73.3%
Neutral0.0%
Negative26.7%

In-app purchases

None

Inside Beauty

No in-app purchases

None

M·A·C X

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Inside Beauty free?
Inside Beauty is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is M·A·C X free?
M·A·C X is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Inside Beauty or M·A·C X?
M·A·C X is rated higher. Inside Beauty averages 3.5 out of 5 from 23 ratings, while M·A·C X averages 3.8 from 16 ratings.
Do Inside Beauty or M·A·C X have ads?
Neither Inside Beauty nor M·A·C X shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Inside Beauty or M·A·C X?
Inside Beauty ships an update every 2 months, and M·A·C X every 3 weeks. Most recently, Inside Beauty was updated on September 3, 2026 and M·A·C X on September 14, 2026.

Other comparisons