Comparison

西安直聘 vs 电池招聘网batthr

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

西安直聘

Features
Read full description

西安直聘-西安人的求职招聘APP,专注本地服务行业招聘!降低企业招工成本,企业0成本发布岗位,无限畅聊! 平台利用人工智能、大数据算法先进技术,助您解决招人难的问题! 领先的互联网招聘模式: ①聊天找工作、挑老板 ②招聘/求职双向智能推荐 ③缔造高效,一小时到岗 平台设有企业屏蔽功能,完全保障你的个人隐私! 严格的职位审核机制,对虚假信息零容忍! 下载西安直聘,多一个渠道,招工高效无忧,好工作随时随地找上你!

About

电池招聘网batthr

Read full description

电池招聘网(Batthr.com)是国内领先的电池招聘网站,目前服务电池制造、电池销售类客户1500多家,拥有电池行业人才优质简历约20万份,上电池招聘网,找电池工作和人才更轻松。招聘热线:400-9020-589

Screenshots

西安直聘4 screens
电池招聘网batthr3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: 电池招聘网batthr at none against 西安直聘's 13. 电池招聘网batthr also leads on iOS requirement (12.0 vs 15.6). 西安直聘's advantage is device support. On price there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 西安直聘 sells 13 one-off in-app purchases. 电池招聘网batthr asks for nothing beyond the download.

Scorecard3 real differences · 3 level
西安直聘 versus 电池招聘网batthr: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter西安直聘电池招聘网batthr
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 2 months—
AdsNo—
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
DevicesiPhone, iPod — better—
Requires iOS15.612.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size71 MB32 MB
Age rating17+4+
Developer奋 黎扬杰 曾

In-app purchases

13 purchases

西安直聘

One-time13
  • 简历置顶+高亮2周$29.99
  • 简历置顶+高亮1个月$49.99
  • 100份简历$149.99
Show 10 more
  • 初级会员$149.99
  • 中级会员$199.99
  • 150份简历$209.99
  • 公司列表置顶服务$299.99
  • 高级会员$299.99
  • 300份简历$399.99
  • VIP企业端服务$399.99
  • 特级会员$449.99
  • 600份简历$799.99
  • 800份简历$999.99
None

电池招聘网batthr

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 西安直聘 free?
西安直聘 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 电池招聘网batthr free?
电池招聘网batthr is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

Other comparisons