Comparison

SimpleBGC32 vs eAttend

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

SimpleBGC32

Control and configure BaseCam SimpleBGC 32-bit controllers with this official mobile application. It mirrors the functionality of the desktop GUI, enabling adjustments for camera stabilizing systems used in handheld and UAV setups.

Highlights
  • Control BaseCam SimpleBGC 32-bit controllers
  • Configure camera stabilizing systems
  • Functionality mirrors desktop GUI
  • Supports firmware 2.5 and later
  • Adjustments for UAV-mounted cameras
Features
Read full description

This is the official app for controlling and setting the BaseCam SimpleBGC 32 bit controller that runs on firmware 2.5 and later. The app has the same functionality like desktop GUI for BaseCam SimpleBGC. BaseCam controllers are used for building camera stabilizing systems for both handheld and UAV-mounted cameras. Gimbals that powered by BaseCam controllers can stabilize different cameras: from GoPro to Red Epic.

About

eAttend

This application facilitates electronic attendance tracking for university students. It allows for easy recording and management of student presence.

Highlights
  • Electronic attendance tracking
  • Student presence management
  • University specific application
  • Mobile attendance recording
Features
Read full description

Al Maaref University electronic Attendance Application.

Screenshots

SimpleBGC324 screens
eAttend4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: SimpleBGC32 at 1.8 against eAttend's 1.0. SimpleBGC32 also leads on update cadence (every 6 months vs every 34 months) and ratings volume (5 vs 1). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

SimpleBGC32 holds the better App Store score, 1.8 against 1.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: SimpleBGC32 has 5 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

SimpleBGC32 ships an update every 6 months, eAttend every 34 months. The most recent releases landed on October 19, 2026 and October 23, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
SimpleBGC32 versus eAttend: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterSimpleBGC32eAttend
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.8 (5 ratings) — better1.0 (1 ratings)
Positive reviews25.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings5 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 6 months — betterEvery 34 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone
Requires iOS11.0 — better16.0
Further details — not scored
Size7 MB26 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperSia BasecamelectronicsGrabi Mohamad

Customer experience

SimpleBGC32

All ratings5 ratings
Positive20.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative80.0%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive25.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative75.0%

eAttend

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

In-app purchases

None

SimpleBGC32

No in-app purchases

None

eAttend

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is SimpleBGC32 free?
SimpleBGC32 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is eAttend free?
eAttend is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, SimpleBGC32 or eAttend?
SimpleBGC32 is rated higher. SimpleBGC32 averages 1.8 out of 5 from 5 ratings, while eAttend averages 1.0 from 1 ratings.
Do SimpleBGC32 or eAttend have ads?
Neither SimpleBGC32 nor eAttend shows ads.
Which is updated more often, SimpleBGC32 or eAttend?
SimpleBGC32 ships an update every 6 months, and eAttend every 34 months. Most recently, SimpleBGC32 was updated on October 19, 2026 and eAttend on October 23, 2026.

Other comparisons