HCA tiMED vs MH
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
HCA tiMED
This mobile application allows affiliated physicians to electronically log and submit their work hours for services performed under a Professional Services Agreement with HCA. It streamlines the time tracking process, replacing manual paper forms and expediting approvals and payments.
- Electronic time logging
- Select specific duties
- Submit timesheets electronically
- Streamlined approval process
- Replaces manual paper forms
Read full descriptionHide full description
tiMED is only available for use by physicians who are affiliated with, and a party to a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) with, HCA. tiMED is a mobile time tracking application that allows physicians to log their time spent performing services under their PSA, replacing the current manual paper process. The app provides an easy to use interface for physicians to select specific duties from his/her professional services agreement with HCA, provide a brief description of the work that was performed and electronically submit the timesheet for proper approvals. This electronic process will reduce approval times and the time to payment under the terms of the PSA.
MH
This app facilitates secure communication and collaboration for clinical care teams. It streamlines medical workflows to speed up decision-making, enhance patient care, and lower costs.
- Secure team communication
- Streamlined clinical workflows
- Accelerated decision-making
- Improved patient care
- Reduced healthcare costs
- Enterprise-level solutions
Read full descriptionHide full description
Mobile Heartbeat uses secure smartphones to enable clinical care teams to communicate and collaborate faster and more efficiently. Our enterprise solutions transform medical communications, streamlining clinical workflows to accelerate decision-making, improve patient care and reduce costs.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: MH at 4.3 against HCA tiMED's 2.0. MH also leads on iOS requirement (12.0 vs 17.0). On price, review sentiment, ratings volume and update cadence there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
MH holds the better App Store score, 4.3 against 2.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 4 and 4 respectively. Written reviews split almost evenly too, at 0% and 0% positive.
Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 4 months. The most recent releases landed on June 22, 2026 and June 4, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | HCA tiMED | MH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 2.0 (4 ratings) | 4.3 (4 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 0.0% of reviews | 0.0% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 4 | 4 |
| Update frequency | Every 4 months | Every 4 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 17.0 | 12.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 6 MB | 107 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | HCA Healthcare, Inc. | MOBILE HEARTBEAT LLC |
Customer experience
HCA tiMED
MH
In-app purchases
HCA tiMED
No in-app purchases
MH
No in-app purchases
