移动令牌 vs Bark
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
移动令牌
Read full descriptionHide full description
移动令牌是一款安全登录工具,每60秒产生一个8位的登录口令。采用SM3算法产生口令，更加安全。
Bark
Send custom push notifications to your iPhone via an HTTP API. Supports advanced features like custom icons, grouping, and critical alerts. Offers privacy-protected, end-to-end encrypted pushes with self-deployable server options.
- HTTP API for push notifications
- Custom icons and grouping
- Continuous and critical alerts
- End-to-end push encryption
- Self-deployable server options
- Privacy-protected notifications
Read full descriptionHide full description
You can send push notifications to your iPhone by simply calling an HTTP API. Bark supports many advanced iOS push features, such as custom icons, notification grouping, custom ringtones, continuous alerts, critical alerts, and encrypted pushes. Bark does not consume device battery, as its core functionality relies on system push services and push extensions, and the app itself does not need to be running. Bark ensures your privacy and security with high reliability. Bark supports self-deploying the server, which can be deployed via Docker, Serverless, or Cloudflare Worker. The bark-server supports most operating systems, and you can also run it manually. The app is compiled and uploaded through Github Action, ensuring that the version you’re using is compiled from open-source code, without any modifications by anyone (including the author). Bark supports end-to-end push encryption with a custom key, ensuring that the push content is not accessed or leaked by the Bark server or Apple’s APNs server during transmission. The notification message history saved locally by Bark is also very secure. Using the NotificationServiceExtension, the push message is only stored on the device when the push is received. Feedback email: to@day.app Privacy Policy: https://api.day.app/privacy User Agreement: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is review sentiment: Bark at 98% against 移动令牌's 0%. Bark also leads on rating (4.9 vs 1.5) and update cadence (every 3 weeks vs every 12 months). 移动令牌's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 2) and iOS requirement (9.0 vs 15.0). On price, ads and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Bark sells 2 in-app purchases, starting at $2.69 per year. 移动令牌 asks for nothing beyond the download.
Bark holds the better App Store score, 4.9 against 1.5. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Bark has 111 ratings behind it against 2, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 0% of 移动令牌's written reviews are positive against 98% of Bark's.
移动令牌 ships an update every 12 months, Bark every 3 weeks. Both last shipped on November 2, 2026.
| Parameter | 移动令牌 | Bark |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 1.5 (2 ratings) | 4.9 (111 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 0.0% of reviews | 98.4% of reviews — better |
| Number of ratings | 2 | 111 — better |
| Update frequency | Every 12 months | Every 3 weeks — better |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No — better | Yes |
| Monetization | — | Free with in-app purchases |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better |
| Requires iOS | 9.0 — better | 15.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 3 MB | 32 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Infosec | 丰 黄 |
Customer experience
移动令牌
Bark
In-app purchases
移动令牌
No in-app purchases
Bark
- Continuous support$2.691 Year
- One-time donation$2.69
