Comparison

e_light vs Fugu 2

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

e_light

Control your smart lights with this app. Easily switch them on/off, adjust brightness, and change colors to create the perfect ambiance. Explore a range of color options to personalize your lighting experience.

Highlights
  • Switch lights on/off
  • Change bulb colors
  • Dim or intensify lights
  • Multiple color options
Read full description

e-light is a very smart APP for controling your lights , which can support the following features: 1.switch on and off the bulb 2.change the lightbulb multiple color,for example: change the color to red, green, blue, yellow and etc. 3.dim or intensify the lights 4.others

About

Fugu 2

This tool captures and redirects network traffic from iOS applications. It supports various proxy protocols and DNS over HTTPS for developers and network professionals. All data is processed locally on your device.

Highlights
  • Capture HTTP/HTTPS/TCP traffic
  • Redirect to proxy server
  • Log network traffic
  • Support ShadowVPN proxy
  • Support Naive proxy
  • Support DNS over HTTPS
Features
Read full description

Fugu is a web developer tool and proxy utility for iOS. This app is designed for developers of network professional to use. Feature √ Capture all HTTP/HTTPS/TCP traffic from any applications on your device, and redirect to an HTTP/HTTPS/SOCKS5/SOCKS5-TLS proxy server; Log all network trafic of HTTP √ Support shadowvpn proxy server √ Support naive proxy server √ Support DNS over https √ Support Hev Socks5 √ Support Quic Socks5 Important notice Hev Socks5 iOS not support mark sockets, so mark optional is disable refrence √ shadowvpn - ShadowVPN is a fast, safe VPN based on libsodium. Designed for low end devices, i.e. OpenWRT routers. https://github.com/we11adam/ShadowVPN √ NaïveProxy - NaïveProxy uses Chromium's network stack to camouflage traffic with strong censorship resistence and low detectablility. Reusing Chrome's stack also ensures best practices in performance and security. https://github.com/klzgrad/naiveproxy √ hev-socks5-server - A tunnel over Socks5 proxy https://github.com/heiher/hev-socks5-server √ quic-proxy-server - A tunnel over Socks5 proxy https://github.com/freetype5678/quic-socks5-server.git how to connect telegram? shadown, hev-socks5 is full global proxy, dont need set socks5 proxy only naiveproxy and quic need set socks5 proxy, because naiveproxy and quic is auto pac by domain, so when use naiveproxy aor quic server, then set socks5 proxy '127.0.0.1:5555' in telegram ------Important Notice---------- Fugu not support VPN server and all data is on your device no AD, no thirk AD SDK to collect useinfo Privacy Policy :https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/scl/fi/a2sfynyktem350ddg8l1w/privacy_fugu.txt?rlkey=jrh48i2c7c6krlb7qc0sbkm7g&dl=0 Fugu values the privacy rights of users and promises that it will not collect or share any of your personal privacy data. The data generated by your use of this software will be saved entirely on your own device, and will not be uploaded to any third-party server. We will not access, collect or disclose any of your personal privacy information.

Screenshots

e_light3 screens
Fugu 22 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Fugu 2 at 5.0 against e_light's 4.0. Fugu 2 also leads on update cadence (every 3 weeks vs every 14 months) and ratings volume (5 vs 1). e_light's advantage is iOS requirement (7.1 vs 15.0). On price, review sentiment, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Fugu 2 holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Fugu 2 has 5 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews split almost evenly too, at 100% and 100% positive.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

e_light ships an update every 14 months, Fugu 2 every 3 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 2, 2026 and November 3, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
e_light versus Fugu 2: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parametere_lightFugu 2
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.0 (1 ratings)5.0 (5 ratings) — better
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews100.0% of reviews
Number of ratings15 — better
Update frequencyEvery 14 monthsEvery 3 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS7.1 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size4 MB45 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer桂标 曾Connect Exchange LLC

Customer experience

e_light

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Fugu 2

All ratings5 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

e_light

No in-app purchases

None

Fugu 2

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is e_light free?
e_light is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Fugu 2 free?
Fugu 2 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, e_light or Fugu 2?
Fugu 2 is rated higher. e_light averages 4.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while Fugu 2 averages 5.0 from 5 ratings.
Do e_light or Fugu 2 have ads?
Neither e_light nor Fugu 2 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, e_light or Fugu 2?
e_light ships an update every 14 months, and Fugu 2 every 3 weeks. Most recently, e_light was updated on November 2, 2026 and Fugu 2 on November 3, 2026.

Other comparisons