Comparison

简讯 vs 倍速阅读

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

简讯

This app delivers concise, key information from diverse fields in about 10 seconds per topic. It aims to break users out of information bubbles by offering random, essential knowledge, helping to fill knowledge gaps and improve conversational skills. Features include book summaries, expert interviews, and user-shared stories.

Highlights
  • 10-second knowledge summaries
  • Anti-algorithm content delivery
  • Book summaries from published works
  • Expert interviews
  • User-shared real-life stories
  • Offline reading support
  • Customizable reading experience
Features
Read full description

信息爆炸,没时间筛选?刷了一天手机,好像什么也没记住? 简讯开门见山,只说重点。平均10秒搞懂一件事,等人、等车、等电梯的碎片时间,就能快速积累全领域知识。 为什么会有简讯这样一款产品? 灵感源于生活里一个扎心的现象:很多糟糕的事情,都是因为缺乏跨行业常识导致的。 一位金融专家可能不知道婴儿发烧不能捂汗,一位高学历的同学可能不知道84消毒液和洁厕灵混用会产生剧毒氯气。这些知识很重要,但平时就是接触不到——大家习惯通过抖音、知乎、头条获取信息,而兴趣算法已经把每个人困在了信息茧房里。 反大数据,主动破茧 抖音、知乎、头条都在猜你喜欢什么,算法把你困在信息茧房里。简讯不做兴趣分类,随机推送你可能需要的知识——从金融股市到生活常识,从职场技巧到人文历史,让你跳出舒适区,接触到原本永远不会看到的领域。 快速增长谈资,补全信息差 聊天总接不上话?客户抛出一个话题你只能尬笑?简讯把全球上万个领域的干货浓缩成精华段落,几分钟就能打开一个全新的认知窗口。知道的事多了,自然变得侃侃而谈。 万卷阅读 • 帮你把书读薄 这是简讯的付费核心功能。内容全部来自出版书籍,由专业编辑研读后抽丝剥茧,每一条都标注出处。你不需要花几天啃完一本书,10秒就能get到书里的核心结论。相当于花一份钱,有人帮你读了几百本书。 问鹿访谈 • 走进不曾了解的行业 每期专访一位行业达人,听他们亲口讲述本行业不为人知的真实经验和职场故事。你从来没接触过的领域,有人把里面的门道给你讲清楚——这也是简讯会员专属的深度内容。 星河故事 • 听真实的人间百态 每晚更新,由用户本人语音讲述真实故事。真人朗读,有口音、有情绪、有温度——跟AI读出来的感觉完全不一样。 【阅读体验】 支持字体大小调节、夜间模式、离线辅助阅读,让每一次浏览都更舒适。 【习惯养成】 可选择开启每日提醒,帮你养成阅读好习惯;桌面小组件无需打开App,一瞥即知今日新知。 【更多亮点】 · 精美日签:每天一张知识日签,把干货变成可收藏、可分享的卡片,质感排版点亮你的每一天。 · 有温度的评论区:每条内容都有专属评论区,和千万读友一起交流观点、碰撞思想,让阅读不再孤单。 · 青少年模式:纯净内容池,给孩子一个安全的知识空间。 · 分类收藏:遇到感兴趣的内容一键收藏,建立自己的专属知识库。 · 笔记功能:阅读时随手记下灵感,好记性不如烂笔头。 他们已经在用了: 「...不会乌烟瘴气,简简单单获取信息,在这个时代好难得...」(用户@潘小虫) 「信息爆炸的时代,需要简讯这样不说废话的App。」(用户@小北) 「每天刷几条,跟客户吃饭终于不尬聊了。」(用户@Kevin) 「本来以为就是个鸡汤App,用了才发现是真的长见识。」(用户@一只特立独行的猫) 很多事,知道结论就够了。 我们在意你的每一条反馈,如何告诉我们: 邮箱:kf@novsoft.com.cn 客服微信:tipsoon2020 微信公众号:简讯APP

About

倍速阅读

Enhance your reading speed and comprehension with this app. It offers personalized training plans and engaging games to improve your ability to quickly extract information and build meaning from texts. Ideal for students and professionals seeking to boost their learning and work efficiency.

Highlights
  • Personalized reading improvement plans
  • Gamified reading exercises
  • Real-world reading technique practice
  • Real-time training data tracking
  • Improved reading speed and memory
  • Enhanced focus and comprehension
Features
Read full description

【应用介绍】 我们已经进入一个飞速发展的时代,需要转变过去“书要慢读”的思维模式,采用适当的阅读技巧,来解决不断出现的新挑战。无论你是学生党还是上班族,都推荐你使用倍速阅读APP,助你在日常的学习与工作中建立正确阅读方式,培养高效阅读习惯! 【使用场景】 如果你是想提高学习效率的学生党: 1、读书效率低,看了记不住? 2、学习没方法,阅读没兴趣? 如果你是想提高工作效率的上班族: 1、每天有大批文件要处理,工作能力差? 2、职场竞争激烈,晋升遥遥无期? 倍速阅读,通过简便任务,助你高强度锻炼阅读能力。不论读文章、读课本、读文件,都能助你渐进养成精准提取信息和快速建构意义的能力。倍速阅读,是高效学习工作必备训练工具。 【应用特色】 1、系统化提升方案:根据不同情况,定制个性化的阅读能力提升方案。坚持使用一段时间后,可有助改善你的阅读速度、记忆、理解、专注等能力; 2、游戏式趣味练习:20多款趣味十足的游戏任务,助你在快乐中不断提升阅读/读书的各项基础能力,做到“玩”有所得; 3、实景化阅读技巧练习:一套真正“懂”你的阅读技巧练习工具。多种辅助阅读模式,在培养正确阅读习惯的同时,助于提升你的阅读效率; 4、训练数据实时追踪:记录你的每日数据,更好发现自身优劣,便于精准提升,快速达成目标!

Screenshots

简讯4 screens
倍速阅读4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: 倍速阅读 at none against 简讯's shown. 倍速阅读 also leads on rating (5.0 vs 4.7). 简讯's advantage is ratings volume (48 vs 1) and update cadence (every 2 weeks vs every 2 months). On price, in-app purchases, monetization model and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 简讯 sells 10 one-off in-app purchases and 倍速阅读 sells 9 one-off in-app purchases. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

倍速阅读 holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.7. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 简讯 has 48 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

简讯 ships an update every 2 weeks, 倍速阅读 every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on November 6, 2026 and November 3, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
简讯 versus 倍速阅读: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter简讯倍速阅读
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.7 (48 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews88.6% of reviews—
Number of ratings48 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 2 weeks — betterEvery 2 months
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesYesYes
MonetizationFree with in-app purchasesFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS14 — better15.6
Further details — not scored
Size166 MB201 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developernovsoft北京大象智酷科技有限公司

Customer experience

简讯

All ratings48 ratings
Positive93.8%
Neutral0.0%
Negative6.3%
Written reviews44 reviews
Positive88.6%
Neutral6.8%
Negative4.5%

倍速阅读

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

10 purchases

简讯

One-time10
  • 解锁问鹿文章$0.99
  • 简讯VIP会员3天$0.99
  • 简讯VIP会员-1个月-30天$3.99
Show 7 more
  • 简讯VIP会员-1年$9.99
  • 3年简讯VIP会员-续费用户专享$12.99
  • 简讯VIP会员-2年-730天$14.99
  • 简讯VIP会员-4年-1460天$14.99
  • 4年简讯VIP会员-续费会员专享$17.99
  • 两年简讯VIP会员$19.99
  • 4年简讯VIP会员$19.99
9 purchases

倍速阅读

One-time9
  • 购买后可升级为永久会员$3.99
  • 月度会员(1个月)$5.99
  • 未来之光$18.00
Show 6 more
  • 购买后可获得一年会员$24.99
  • 永久版VIP-学生专属$25.99
  • 购买后可获得永久会员2 variants$29.99
  • 优惠10元永久会员$29.99
  • 218元永久会员$31.99
  • 永久会员$41.99

Questions

Is 简讯 free?
简讯 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 倍速阅读 free?
倍速阅读 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, 简讯 or 倍速阅读?
倍速阅读 is rated higher. 简讯 averages 4.7 out of 5 from 48 ratings, while 倍速阅读 averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do 简讯 or 倍速阅读 have ads?
简讯 shows ads; 倍速阅读 does not.
Which is updated more often, 简讯 or 倍速阅读?
简讯 ships an update every 2 weeks, and 倍速阅读 every 2 months. Most recently, 简讯 was updated on November 6, 2026 and 倍速阅读 on November 3, 2026.

Other comparisons