Comparison

ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint vs alladin Nettest

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint

Easily test the performance of wired Ethernet and Wi-Fi networks using your smartphone or tablet. This tool simplifies network assessment with a user-friendly interface and clear reports, making it ideal for professionals.

Highlights
  • Test wired Ethernet and Wi-Fi performance
  • User-friendly interface
  • Speedy and accurate testing
  • Generate clear reports
  • Add-on for ByteBlower server
  • Reproducible results
Features
Read full description

Did you think that assessing the performance of Wi-Fi networks was complex, time-consuming and expensive? Meet ByteBlower® - a unique, utterly user-friendly tool to speedily and accurately test the performance of wired Ethernet and Wi-Fi networks, as well as network equipment. The ByteBlower Endpoint app is the mobile equivalent of a ByteBlower traffic port. It helps you test the performance of your Wi-Fi networks on any smartphone or tablet in three simple steps: • download the app • run the test scenario (via your familiar ByteBlower GUI) • analyze the report to see how your Wi-Fi networks are performing. Why ByteBlower? Built by Excentis, an international expert in network testing technology, ByteBlower is the favorite performance testing platform of numerous telecom/network operators and equipment manufacturers/vendors around the world. They love it for its: • unequalled ease-of-use (e.g. very easy to provide reproducible results) • flexibility • scalability • crystal-clear reports • low TCO thanks to the all-in-one concept (server, GUI, API client software, licenses, updates and support) Remember, this is not a standalone application for Wi-Fi network performance tests. ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint is an add-on to be used in combination with the ByteBlower server.

About

alladin Nettest

This app provides objective and transparent internet speed and quality testing. It analyzes over 150 parameters, including speed, QoS, and QoE, and supports drive tests. Results are compliant with EU and German standards.

Highlights
  • Tests 150+ parameters (speed, QoS, QoE)
  • Objective, secure, and transparent results
  • Compliant with BEREC, ETSI/ITU-T, and TK-TVO standards
  • Supports drive tests with optional hardware integration
  • Open-source and open-data based
  • Heat map visualization of network performance
Features
Read full description

The alladin Nettest (https://alladin.at) is an independent, crowd-sourced, open-source and open-data based solution. • Generates and processes all results objectively, securely and transparently • Tests 150+ parameters: speed, QoS & QoE • Enables drive tests. Optional hardware-integration • 100% compliant to BEREC (EU), ETSI/ITU-T standards and to TK-TVO (DE). Our solution is more than the solution of choice among our customers: universities and international research projects increasingly use our published code as a basis and benchmark for research in the field of data transmission quality. Transparency and expertise are the template on which we base our work and development. Further qualities of the alladin Nettest are: Accurate Our measurement algorithm was developed by our network experts together with government technology specialists from mobile and fixed network communications. The measurement hypotheses were iteratively falsified and/or finally verified in the laboratory under simulated network conditions. This generally formulated method of measurement is equally reliable in testing variable, slow wireless connections and stable broadband connections. It maps the typical usage behaviour of an end user in terms of monitoring period, packet size, number of threads etc. Comprehensive Our Nettest evaluates all the currently available Internet usage scenarios as a whole in one piece of software. This includes the usual measurements such as signal, bandwidth, latency or packet loss, but focuses particularly on parameters regarding network neutrality and quality of service. It measures how the end user experiences the quality of his personal Internet usage. A good signal is no guarantee of high speed. High speed is no guarantee of constant video transmission - and consequently no guarantee of user satisfaction either. QoE can only be described quantitatively by means of extensive QoS measurements. Mapped By default we use Google Maps with reduced colour spectrum as a basic map. Semi-transparent layers (Google Layers) are placed on top of them to show the points and the heat map. The heat map depicts available services such as e.g. download speed by means of two dimensions: colour and transparency. The colour defines the range of values. The transparency aggregates the number of measurements at a particular map point. The significance of the monitored service is presented and evaluated by this means. By selecting the zoom level and filter, a new heat map is generated using the PostGIS/PostgreSQL database. Our caching system guarantees prompt delivery of the map tiles. Open In our opinion, the most important aspect of a measurement tool is the credibility of the results. This is why we opted for open source as the most direct and most transparent type of documentation. This is the only way the functioning of the method of measurement can be verified comprehensibly and objectively. We also publish all the measurement results as open data - respecting protection of privacy, of course. Reliable The reliability of (aggregated) statistical evaluations depends primarily on the quality of each individual measurement result. Our quality control is fully automated and is achieved by comparison of parts of a measurement and cross-comparison with different measurements. The testing system is designed to be adaptive, i.e. once identified; irregularities are automatically identified if they occur subsequently. Measurements identified as anomalies are not censored, of course. Significant Uploading and downloading are measured, as are all the relevant parameters for monitoring network quality, such as latency, packet variance, jitter, packet loss etc. Furthermore, our Nettest processes all the important meta-information which describes the context of a measurement. Only by this means can measurement results be tested and validated thoroughly for significance and reliability.

Screenshots

ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint2 screens
alladin Nettest4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: alladin Nettest at 100% against ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint's 0%. alladin Nettest also leads on rating (5.0 vs 3.7) and iOS requirement (12.4 vs 14.0). ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint's advantage is ratings volume (3 vs 1). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

alladin Nettest holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.7. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 3 and 1 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 0% of ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint's written reviews are positive against 100% of alladin Nettest's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint ships an update every 3 months, alladin Nettest every 6 months. The most recent releases landed on September 14, 2026 and June 1, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint versus alladin Nettest: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterByteBlower Wireless Endpointalladin Nettest
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.7 (3 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings3 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 3 months — betterEvery 6 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS14.012.4 — better
Further details — not scored
Size29 MB145 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperExcentis NValladin-IT GmbH

Customer experience

ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint

All ratings3 ratings
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

alladin Nettest

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint

No in-app purchases

None

alladin Nettest

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint free?
ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is alladin Nettest free?
alladin Nettest is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint or alladin Nettest?
alladin Nettest is rated higher. ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint averages 3.7 out of 5 from 3 ratings, while alladin Nettest averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint or alladin Nettest have ads?
Neither ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint nor alladin Nettest shows ads.
Which is updated more often, ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint or alladin Nettest?
ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint ships an update every 3 months, and alladin Nettest every 6 months. Most recently, ByteBlower Wireless Endpoint was updated on September 14, 2026 and alladin Nettest on June 1, 2026.

Other comparisons