奇安信ID vs 数字路桥
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
奇安信ID
This utility app provides dynamic passwords and QR code authorization for enterprise clients. It enables single sign-on and secure access to business systems.
- Dynamic password generation
- QR code authorization
- Enterprise single sign-on
- Secure business system access
Read full descriptionHide full description
获取动态口令和扫码授权。用于企业客户业务系统单点登录和扫码授权。
数字路桥
Read full descriptionHide full description
基于施工现场一体化管理模式，深度融合移动互联、物联网、云计算、大数据等新一代信息技术，统筹实现各标段人员实名制、门禁考勤、现场视频监控、广播喊话、施工班组及班前教育等全维度管理，并完成各类数据实时统计分析。依托功能全面集成、可定制化、可视化操作、智能数据分析等技术优势，转变传统工地管理方式，全方位赋能建筑施工场景，打造更安全、高效、精益的数字化智慧工地。
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is iOS requirement: 奇安信ID at 8.0 against 数字路桥's 15.0. On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 5 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 2, 2026 and November 5, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | 奇安信ID | 数字路桥 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 1.0 (5 ratings) — better | — |
| Number of ratings | 5 — better | — |
| Update frequency | Every 5 weeks | Every 5 weeks |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | — |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 8.0 — better | 15.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 16 MB | 74 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | legendsec | Sichuan Jingwei Wanda Technology Co., Ltd. |
In-app purchases
奇安信ID
No in-app purchases
数字路桥
No in-app purchases
