Comparison

Fogger Log vs Traction Field

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Fogger Log

This app helps users map their fogging routes in real-time. It offers wireless connection to a controller for tracking and control, with offline mapping capabilities. Routes are stored on the device for later upload.

Highlights
  • Real-time route mapping
  • Wireless controller connection
  • Fogger control
  • Offline mapping
  • On-device data storage
  • Route upload
Read full description

Easily map your fogging route in real time. Wirelessly connect your Fogger Log controller for simple route tracking and fogger control. No data? No problem. Mapping is available offline and stored on device so you can upload later when convenient.

About

Traction Field

Map and sample fields offline without a cellular connection. Define field boundaries, create sampling grids, and navigate to log sample locations. Export data for use in other applications.

Highlights
  • Offline field mapping
  • Define field boundaries
  • Layout sampling grid
  • Navigate to sample sites
  • Log sample locations
  • Export sample points
Read full description

-Sample and map offline, no cellular connection required -Drive your field boundaries -Layout sampling target grid on your field -Navigate to sample target site and log actual sample locations -Export sample points and email to third-party applications

Screenshots

Fogger Log4 screens
Traction Field4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Traction Field at 5.0 against Fogger Log's 4.8. Fogger Log's advantage is update cadence (every 2 weeks vs every 2 months). On price, ratings volume, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Traction Field holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.8. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 4 and 3 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Fogger Log ships an update every 2 weeks, Traction Field every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 23, 2026 and October 19, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
Fogger Log versus Traction Field: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterFogger LogTraction Field
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.8 (4 ratings)5.0 (3 ratings) — better
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings4 — better3
Update frequencyEvery 2 weeks — betterEvery 2 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS15.0 — better16
Further details — not scored
Size38 MB36 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperFogger Log LLCTraction Ag

Customer experience

Fogger Log

All ratings4 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews2 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Traction Field

All ratings3 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Fogger Log

No in-app purchases

None

Traction Field

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Fogger Log free?
Fogger Log is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Traction Field free?
Traction Field is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Fogger Log or Traction Field?
Traction Field is rated higher. Fogger Log averages 4.8 out of 5 from 4 ratings, while Traction Field averages 5.0 from 3 ratings.
Do Fogger Log or Traction Field have ads?
Neither Fogger Log nor Traction Field shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Fogger Log or Traction Field?
Fogger Log ships an update every 2 weeks, and Traction Field every 2 months. Most recently, Fogger Log was updated on October 23, 2026 and Traction Field on October 19, 2026.

Other comparisons