Comparison

WAM vs InOutKitTracker

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

WAM

Manage your organization's assets and schedule maintenance to ensure optimal efficiency and service. This web-based program offers an accessible and affordable solution for tracking inventory and improving operational performance.

Highlights
  • Bespoke asset inventory
  • Maintenance scheduling
  • Operational efficiency tracking
  • Web-based program
  • Affordable asset management
Features
Read full description

Workflow Asset Management – or WAM - is a simple, accessible web based programme that combines a bespoke inventory of your organisation’s assets with a maintenance scheduling tool to help ensure their optimum efficiency and so, in turn, excellent operational service. This year we’ve introduced a host of new features and the programme’s now being hailed by its hundreds of users – including leisure centres, spas, and hotels – as one of the easiest, most efficient and most affordable asset management systems on the market, perfectly in tune and always up to date with the ever changing demands of management teams. We’re now talking to leisure groups, spas, hotels, schools and hospital and care homes.

About

InOutKitTracker

Features
Read full description

inOut Kit Tracker is a field tool for traffic management teams to track kit, vehicles, jobs, and QR labels. Staff can scan labels on site, record movements, check stock, manage vehicle assignments, and keep job records aligned between the yard and the live operation. Built for roadworks and temporary traffic management workflows, the app helps supervisors and crews see what kit is out, what has returned, what needs attention, and which jobs still have equipment assigned.

Screenshots

WAM4 screens
InOutKitTracker4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is device support: WAM at 3 against InOutKitTracker's 1. WAM also leads on iOS requirement (15.0 vs 17.0). On price, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences · 6 level
WAM versus InOutKitTracker: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterWAMInOutKitTracker
PriceFreeFree
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews—
Update frequencyEvery 8 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone
Requires iOS15.0 — better17.0
Further details — not scored
Size72 MB1 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperEmpresa LimitedWILLIAM JOHN M CLARKE

In-app purchases

None

WAM

No in-app purchases

None

InOutKitTracker

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is WAM free?
WAM is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is InOutKitTracker free?
InOutKitTracker is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do WAM or InOutKitTracker have ads?
Neither WAM nor InOutKitTracker shows ads.

Other comparisons