Comparison

通达OA精灵2017 vs 协同签名

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

通达OA精灵2017

This mobile application serves as the portable version of a leading office software system, offering essential features for businesses. It provides access to email, announcements, schedules, contacts, workflows, and instant messaging for seamless remote work.

Highlights
  • Email access
  • Announcements and notifications
  • Schedule management
  • Contact directory
  • Workflow processing
  • Instant messaging
Features
Read full description

通达OA精灵2017是通达OA网络智能办公系统的移动版软件,通达OA是国内领先的办公软件产品,已拥有上万家企事业单位用户。移动版提供了邮件、公告通知、日程安排、通讯薄、工作流、微讯等功能模块。其中,微讯作为移动版的主要功能之一,体现统一通讯理念。

About

协同签名

Features
Read full description

协同安心签,果机速必达! 协同签名移动端应用程序是由网络信任与数字安全服务领军企业——北京数字认证股份有限公司荣誉出品的移动端网络身份认证应用。 数字化时代,我们深知信息安全、身份鉴别的重要性,协同签名iOS版依靠数字认证公司权威的电子认证机构资质,结合苹果便携系统先进的数据加密与存储技术,强强联合为您的移动设备提供了坚不可摧的安全屏障。 在协同签名应用程序中,无论您是需要认证身份登陆办公门户、签署重要文书、查询操作记录或是管理数字证书,只需轻点指尖,一切尽在掌握。我们的应用界面简洁友好,操作流畅,让复杂的数字证书应用变得简单易懂,即便是初学者也能迅速上手。 特色功能包括: ---一键证书管理:轻松查看、添加或删除您的安全数字证书,管理从未如此简便。 ---安全签署电子文书:支持远程签署各类文件,无论是合同、协议还是报表,确保每一次签名都合法有效,且不可篡改。 ---高强度加密:采用行业领先的安全标准,确保数据传输与存储的每个环节都安全无忧。 ---广泛兼容:支持多种格式的数据与文档,兼容市场上主流的操作系统和设备,满足不同用户多场景需求。 ---便捷身份验证:安全合规的数字证书申请流程需要核验您真实身份,应用将快速又安全地完成验证流程,提升效率同时保障个人信息安全。 协同签名移动端应用程序是您移动办公、认证签名的可靠助理,让数字生活更加安心、高效。立即下载,开启您的安全数字之旅!

Screenshots

通达OA精灵20171 screens
协同签名4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: 协同签名 at 100% against 通达OA精灵2017's 27%. 协同签名 also leads on rating (2.3 vs 1.0). 通达OA精灵2017's advantage is update cadence (fortnightly vs every 5 weeks) and iOS requirement (9.0 vs 13). On price, ratings volume, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

协同签名 holds the better App Store score, 2.3 against 1.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 3 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 27% of 通达OA精灵2017's written reviews are positive against 100% of 协同签名's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

通达OA精灵2017 ships an update fortnightly, 协同签名 every 5 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 8, 2026 and October 24, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
通达OA精灵2017 versus 协同签名: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter通达OA精灵2017协同签名
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.0 (2 ratings)2.3 (3 ratings) — better
Positive reviews27.3% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings23 — better
Update frequencyFortnightly — betterEvery 5 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS9.0 — better13
Further details — not scored
Size57 MB62 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer北京通达信科科技有限公司Beijing Certificate Authority Co., Ltd.

Customer experience

通达OA精灵2017

All ratings2 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%
Written reviews22 reviews
Positive27.3%
Neutral22.7%
Negative50.0%

协同签名

All ratings3 ratings
Positive33.3%
Neutral0.0%
Negative66.7%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

通达OA精灵2017

No in-app purchases

None

协同签名

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 通达OA精灵2017 free?
通达OA精灵2017 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 协同签名 free?
协同签名 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 通达OA精灵2017 or 协同签名?
协同签名 is rated higher. 通达OA精灵2017 averages 1.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while 协同签名 averages 2.3 from 3 ratings.
Do 通达OA精灵2017 or 协同签名 have ads?
Neither 通达OA精灵2017 nor 协同签名 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 通达OA精灵2017 or 协同签名?
通达OA精灵2017 ships an update fortnightly, and 协同签名 every 5 weeks. Most recently, 通达OA精灵2017 was updated on October 8, 2026 and 协同签名 on October 24, 2026.

Other comparisons