Comparison

EFQRCode vs TimeBank

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

EFQRCode

This library allows developers to generate and recognize QR codes within their applications. It supports adding watermarks or icons to QR codes and works across multiple Apple platforms. The tool is built using CoreGraphics, CoreImage, and ImageIO for efficient operation.

Highlights
  • Generate QR codes with watermarks/icons
  • Recognize QR codes from images
  • Lightweight pure-Swift library
  • Cross-platform support (iOS, macOS, tvOS)
  • Integration via CocoaPods, Carthage, SPM
Features
Read full description

EFQRCode is a lightweight, pure-Swift library for generating pretty QRCode image with input watermark or icon and recognizing QRCode from image, it is based on CoreGraphics, CoreImage and ImageIO. EFQRCode provides you a better way to operate QRCode in your app, it works on iOS, macOS and tvOS, and it is available through CocoaPods, Carthage and Swift Package Manager. 1. Please select a high contrast foreground and background color combinations; 2. You should use magnification instead of size if you want to improve the definition of QRCode image, you can also increase the value of them; 3. Magnification too high/Size too long/Content too much may cause failure; 4. It is recommended to test the QRCode image before put it into use; 5. You can contact me if there is any problem, both Issue and Pull request are welcome. EFQRCode is available under the MIT license, for more information: https://github.com/EFPrefix/EFQRCode

About

TimeBank

This utility tool helps you track your time by categorizing activities into 'SaveTime' and 'KillTime'. Your 'time deposit' balance is calculated as the difference between these two categories. The app prioritizes user privacy, collecting no data and offering optional iCloud backup.

Highlights
  • Categorize time into SaveTime & KillTime
  • Calculate 'time deposit' balance
  • User privacy focused
  • Optional iCloud data backup
  • Offline functionality
Features
Read full description

This is a simple tool for tracking time, different from other productivity and focus-oriented apps. It forces the categorization of time into two main types: SaveTime & KillTime. You can allocate any task into these two categories based on your own experience and understanding. Ultimately, your 'time deposit' balance is the difference between SaveTime and KillTime. Please take good care of your 'wallet'. Regarding privacy: We do not collect any of your data. If you choose to use iCloud for data backup, you will need to grant this app access to the internet. No one, including the developer of this app, can read your data backed up on iCloud. Your data belongs solely to you. Of course, you can turn off the app's internet access at any time, which will not affect any of its functionality.

Screenshots

EFQRCode4 screens
TimeBank4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: TimeBank at 88% against EFQRCode's 33%. TimeBank also leads on rating (5.0 vs 4.3) and update cadence (monthly vs every 2 months). EFQRCode's advantage is ratings volume (11 vs 2) and iOS requirement (14.0 vs 17.0). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

TimeBank holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: EFQRCode has 11 ratings behind it against 2, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 33% of EFQRCode's written reviews are positive against 88% of TimeBank's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

EFQRCode ships an update every 2 months, TimeBank monthly. The most recent releases landed on October 5, 2026 and October 8, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
EFQRCode versus TimeBank: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterEFQRCodeTimeBank
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.3 (11 ratings)5.0 (2 ratings) — better
Positive reviews33.3% of reviews87.5% of reviews — better
Number of ratings11 — better2
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsMonthly — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod, Apple TViPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Watch, Vision Pro — better
Requires iOS14.0 — better17.0
Further details — not scored
Size5 MB4 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer政 徐睿 刘

Customer experience

EFQRCode

All ratings11 ratings
Positive81.8%
Neutral0.0%
Negative18.2%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive33.3%
Neutral0.0%
Negative66.7%

TimeBank

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews8 reviews
Positive87.5%
Neutral12.5%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

EFQRCode

No in-app purchases

None

TimeBank

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is EFQRCode free?
EFQRCode is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is TimeBank free?
TimeBank is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, EFQRCode or TimeBank?
TimeBank is rated higher. EFQRCode averages 4.3 out of 5 from 11 ratings, while TimeBank averages 5.0 from 2 ratings.
Do EFQRCode or TimeBank have ads?
Neither EFQRCode nor TimeBank shows ads.
Which is updated more often, EFQRCode or TimeBank?
EFQRCode ships an update every 2 months, and TimeBank monthly. Most recently, EFQRCode was updated on October 5, 2026 and TimeBank on October 8, 2026.

Other comparisons