Comparison

Double Square Racing 2D vs Circlix

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both games, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Double Square Racing 2D

Control two squares simultaneously in a challenging racing game. Collect all squares while skillfully avoiding circles to achieve the highest score. Test your reflexes and coordination in this fast-paced arcade experience.

Highlights
  • Simultaneous dual-square control
  • Collect all squares
  • Avoid circles
  • High score chasing
  • Simple tap controls
Features
Read full description

Control the red square and the blue square at the same time. Tap on the left side of the screen to control red square and tap on the right to control blue. Collect all the squares and avoid the circles. Try to score as much as possible Thank you for playing double square racing game 2d

About

Circlix

Navigate a rotating circle through space, avoiding incoming shapes. This game features simple tap controls, stunning visuals, and captivating music. Test your reflexes and see if you can survive the challenge.

Highlights
  • Easy-to-learn tap controls
  • Spectacular visual effects
  • Gorgeous background music
  • Avoid incoming shapes
  • Rotating circle mechanic
Features
Read full description

Exciting adventure of the rotating Circle in the space. Tap right, tap left easy-to-learn control mechanism, spectacular visual effects and gorgeous background music. Be careful, half of the Circle must not fill. Avoid from coming shapes. At the beginning just let some shapes to snap the Circle, after that you should escape from them. Can you do that? Sounds weird? Come on test yourself!

Screenshots

Double Square Racing 2D3 screens
Circlix4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Circlix at 5.0 against Double Square Racing 2D's 3.0. Circlix also leads on ads (none vs shown) and iOS requirement (9.0 vs 12.0). Double Square Racing 2D's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 1). On price, ratings volume and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Circlix sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. Double Square Racing 2D asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Circlix holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 1 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
Double Square Racing 2D versus Circlix: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterDouble Square Racing 2DCirclix
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.0 (2 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews50.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings2 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 25 months—
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationAd-supported — betterFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS12.09.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size95 MB74 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperAleksa RacovicSplash Colors, MChJ

Customer experience

Double Square Racing 2D

All ratings2 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews2 reviews
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%

Circlix

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Double Square Racing 2D

No in-app purchases

1 purchases

Circlix

One-time1
  • Remove Ads$0.99

Questions

Is Double Square Racing 2D free?
Double Square Racing 2D is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Circlix free?
Circlix is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, Double Square Racing 2D or Circlix?
Circlix is rated higher. Double Square Racing 2D averages 3.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while Circlix averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do Double Square Racing 2D or Circlix have ads?
Double Square Racing 2D shows ads; Circlix does not.

Other comparisons