Comparison

ezShare Lite+ vs iProfiler

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

ezShare Lite+

Wirelessly browse, download, and back up photos and videos from a Wi-Fi SD card to your iPhone or iPad. Supports various image and video formats, batch downloads, and EXIF metadata display. Easily share your media with friends.

Highlights
  • Wireless browsing and downloading from Wi-Fi SD card
  • Automatic backup to iPhone/iPad
  • Batch download support
  • EXIF metadata display
  • Share photos and videos
  • Supports JPG, RAW, MPG, MP4, MOV formats
Features
Read full description

ezShare Lite is specifically designed for ez Share Wi-Fi SD card. Featuress: 1.Browse and download images or videos from the Wi-Fi SD card wirelessly. Support batch download. 2.Backup the Wi-Fi SD card's images to iPhone and iPad automatically. 3.Supported image formats: JPG and RAW; supported video formats: mpg, mp4, mov and etc. 4.Share or email your images to your friends. 5.Support EXIF metadata display. Any suggestions or feedbacks are appreciated. Email: wificarddev@gmail.com ezShare Lite is a third party App based on the ezShare Wi-Fi SD card. The official client is ez Share. If you think the official client is not good enough, you can try ezShare Lite. ezShare Lite not only includes all the features of the official App, but also a key to save, automatic download, photo filtering and other pro features. Be the best ezshare client!

About

iProfiler

Read full description

iProfiler allows you to accurately show pictures based on a custom ICC profile that is created using iProfiler in conjunction with remoteProfiler (Available as a free download on AppForce.One) on Mac OS and a (not included) profiling solution like i1Profiler from X-Rite in combination with for instance an i1Display Pro. After measuring a custom profile, use the Finder to copy that icc profile to iProfiler and restart iProfiler. Then select some images from your photo library and adjust the Chromatic Adaptation slider to match the iOS device to your Mac.

Screenshots

ezShare Lite+4 screens
iProfiler2 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: ezShare Lite+ at every 3 weeks against iProfiler's every 14 months. iProfiler's advantage is iOS requirement (11.0 vs 15.6). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

ezShare Lite+ costs $9.99 and iProfiler $9.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

ezShare Lite+ ships an update every 3 weeks, iProfiler every 14 months. The most recent releases landed on November 3, 2026 and November 7, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
ezShare Lite+ versus iProfiler: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterezShare Lite+iProfiler
Price$9.99$9.99
Rating4.3 (14 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews75.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings14 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeks — betterEvery 14 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationPaid—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS15.611.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size11 MB15 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer杨 李Boudewijn Krijger

In-app purchases

None

ezShare Lite+

No in-app purchases

None

iProfiler

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is ezShare Lite+ free?
ezShare Lite+ costs $9.99, with no in-app purchases.
Is iProfiler free?
iProfiler costs $9.99, with no in-app purchases.
Do ezShare Lite+ or iProfiler have ads?
Neither ezShare Lite+ nor iProfiler shows ads.
Which is updated more often, ezShare Lite+ or iProfiler?
ezShare Lite+ ships an update every 3 weeks, and iProfiler every 14 months. Most recently, ezShare Lite+ was updated on November 3, 2026 and iProfiler on November 7, 2026.

Other comparisons