Atmospheric Model vs StellarRAD
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Atmospheric Model
Explore planetary atmospheres with a radiative transfer model. Calculate emission temperatures and flux densities, then modify parameters like albedo and solar constant to simulate atmospheric changes and their effects on climate.
- Radiative transfer model for planetary atmospheres
- Calculates emission temperature and flux densities
- Adjustable parameters: albedo, distance from sun, extinction coefficients
- Supports 9 solar system planets or custom planets
- Generates flux diagrams of incoming and outgoing radiation
- Saves and compares two model run results
- Exports data to CSV for spreadsheet analysis
Read full descriptionHide full description
The app uses a simple radiative transfer model for a planet with two leaky* atmospheric layers. It begins by calculating Te, the emission temperature of the planet by using the Solar constant and planetary Albedo. Te is called the Blackbody temperature because it is inferred by fitting a Blackbody curve to the observed outbound LWIR radiation. You can choose any of the 9 planets in our solar system, or choose one of your own making. The app then uses 5 parameters for the chosen “base” planet: the Albedo (alpha), distance from the sun (r), extinction coefficients of two atmospheric layers (epsilon1, 2), and the solar constant S0 to calculate temperatures and radiative flux densities. One can modify these 5 adjustable parameters from their base values, and update the result. A flux diagram is generated showing the incoming short wavelength (SW), and outgoing long wavelength (LW) radiation. Two model run results can be saved and differences displayed. Also, runs can be saved to a .csv file for E-mail export and spreadsheet analysis. Calculate the “natural” 33K greenhouse effect (compare Earth with and without an atmosphere), or change the extinction coefficients to see the effect of adding or reducing absorbing gasses. Predict what Mars might be like with an atmosphere, or see what would happen if the characteristics of our sun, albedo or planetary orbit change. This simple model can create hours of fun. The base parameter values for Earth nicely calculate Ts, Te, and T1 (upper troposphere) values, and the model correctly predicts Te’s for all the planets. INSTRUCTIONS: Load app, choose a “base” planet, segue with Update. Click Update to calculate the temperatures and flux densities. Segue to inspect the flux densities, and/or modify the base parameters to see changes. Save and compare differences in 2 runs. (C/C0) values are in CO2 equivalents. Save runs to .csv file for spreadsheet analysis. USAGE TIPS: Start with a base planet, but realize this simple 2 layer model cannot accurately predict the surface temperatures of the gas giants or Venus. Pressing the Back button allows you to refresh your parameter or base planet choices. Remember a 5 K change in Ts resulted in the Earth’s last Ice Age! For convenience, the Test planet can be used to create your own set of parameters without entering a planet name. Increasing the solar constant increases all temperatures. Increasing epsilon does nothing to Te, which depends only on S0, r, and alpha. Press On/Off & Home takes flux diagram screenshot. It is easy to remove a saved data file run (row) after import to spreadsheet. RADIATIVE FORCING and CLIMATE SENSITIVITY: Radiative forcing (dF) can be used to estimate the change in surface temperature (dTs) arising from that forcing using: dTs = lambda x dF, where lambda is the Climate Sensitivity in K / (W/m2). Forcing due to an atmospheric greenhouse gas such as CO2 can be expressed as: dF (in W/m2) = 5.35 × ln (C/C0), where C is the CO2 concentration [CO2] and C0 is the initial concentration (in ppm). For a single atmospheric layer Earth, changing the base value of epsilon = 0.78 to epsilon = 0.83 (d-epsilon = 0.05) gives an 3K T rise; roughly the equivalent of doubling [CO2] (and a forcing of 3.71 W/m2). There has been a [CO2] increase between the years 1750 (280 ppm) and 2000 (380 ppm). Thus dF = 5.35 x ln (370/280) = 1.5 W/m2. dTs = lambda x dF = 0.8 (K/(W/m2)) x 1.5 (W/m2) = 1.2 K over that timeframe (d-epsilon 0.02 used). * Leaky implies epsilon less than 1.
StellarRAD
This app enables real-time light spectrum analysis using WiFi-enabled spectrometers. It allows users to capture and analyze various light parameters, including spectral irradiance, lumens, and colorimetric data like CRI and CCT. Data can be easily saved and exported in multiple formats.
- Real-time light measurement
- Full spectrum analysis
- Control spectrometer
- Spectral irradiance and lumens
- Colorimetric analysis (CRI, CCT, xy)
- Save and export data (.IRR, screenshot, PDF)
Read full descriptionHide full description
The StellarRAD App for all WiFi enabled StellarNet spectrometers makes real-time light measurement quick and easy. Acquire full spectrum analysis of LEDs, lamps, lasers, solar/ grow lights, & just about any type of luminaire from ultra-violet through the visible and near-infrared! This intuitive app lets users control their spectrometer and capture basic and more advanced light measurement parameters such as spectral irradiance and lumens. Colorimetric analysis such as CRI (color rendering index), CCT (correlated color temperature), xy chromaticity, and much more. Easily save and export your data and full spectral graph as .IRR text data file, screenshot, and/or PDF report with all parameters listed.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is review sentiment: Atmospheric Model at 100% against StellarRAD's 33%. Atmospheric Model also leads on rating (5.0 vs 3.6) and device support (3 vs 1). StellarRAD's advantage is update cadence (every 3 days vs every 36 months) and ratings volume (10 vs 1). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
Atmospheric Model holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.6. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: StellarRAD has 10 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 100% of Atmospheric Model's written reviews are positive against 33% of StellarRAD's.
Atmospheric Model ships an update every 36 months, StellarRAD every 3 days. The most recent releases landed on October 10, 2026 and September 13, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | Atmospheric Model | StellarRAD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 5.0 (1 ratings) — better | 3.6 (10 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 100.0% of reviews — better | 33.3% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 1 | 10 — better |
| Update frequency | Every 36 months | Every 3 days — better |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | iPhone |
| Requires iOS | 12.0 — better | 16.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 12 MB | 80 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Richard Loda | Stellarnet Inc |
Customer experience
Atmospheric Model
StellarRAD
In-app purchases
Atmospheric Model
No in-app purchases
StellarRAD
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is Atmospheric Model free?
Is StellarRAD free?
Which has better reviews, Atmospheric Model or StellarRAD?
Do Atmospheric Model or StellarRAD have ads?
Which is updated more often, Atmospheric Model or StellarRAD?
Other comparisons















