Comparison

Sampling Calculator vs TQS Code Reader

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Sampling Calculator

This tool helps calculate sampling plans based on ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 and MIL-STD-105E standards. It supports various sampling size code letters and AQLs for normal, tightened, and reduced inspections. It serves as an aid to understanding and applying these quality control standards.

Highlights
  • ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 2013 compliance
  • MIL-STD-105E compliance
  • Single sampling size code letters
  • Normal, Tightened, and Reduced inspection
  • AQLs from 0.065 to 15
Features
Read full description

The sampling calculator conforms to ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 2013 and MIL-STD-105E Standards. NOTE: This calculator may be used as an aid to faster calculate the sampling plan needed, and always in conjunction or with the basic knowledge of the ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 standard. It does not replace the standards mentioned above. The sampling calculator covers single sampling size code letters I, II, III, S1, S2, S3 and S4. Normal, Tightened and Reduced with AQLs from 0.065 to 15.

About

TQS Code Reader

This app decodes and validates 1D and 2D barcodes, checking their content against GS1 and IFA specifications. It provides detailed information about detected identifiers and displays inspection results clearly, storing them in a history database.

Highlights
  • GS1 and IFA code parsing
  • 1D and 2D code decoding
  • Detailed identifier information
  • Structure and content validation
  • Clear inspection result display
  • History database for scanned codes
Read full description

This app has been developed from scratch to support iOS devices now. It contains many improvements, such as a new GS1 and IFA data parser and validator. In addition, it is possible to view detailed information about the detected identifiers. The TQS Code Reader is an application for decoding and checking 1D and 2D codes. The app checks the code content for conformity with the current specifications of GS1 (www.gs1.org) and IFA (www.ifaffm.de). It supports the most important code types. SCOPE OF SERVICES The app allows the reading of the following code types: Code 128, Code 39, Code 93, Codabar, DataMatrix, EAN-13, EAN-8, ITF, QR Code, UPC-A, UPC-E, PDF417 and Aztec. The code content is parsed to interpret and check the contained data. CHECKS PERFORMED The code content is checked according to the following criteria: CHECKING THE STRUCTURE - Invalid pairs of element strings - Mandatory association of element strings CHECKING THE CONTENTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFIERS - Used charset - Data length - Check digit - Control character DISPLAY OF INSPECTION RESULTS The inspection results are displayed clearly and structured. Control characters are replaced in the raw value field by readable characters. Each detected element is displayed separately with its value. Reasons for errors are displayed and an overall result of the check is visualized. STORAGE OF INSPECTION RESULTS Scanned codes are stored in a history database. From there, the inspection results can be retrieved again.

Screenshots

Sampling Calculator2 screens
TQS Code Reader4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: TQS Code Reader at Free against Sampling Calculator's $5.99. TQS Code Reader also leads on update cadence (every 6 months vs every 16 months). Sampling Calculator's advantage is chart position (#173 vs unranked). On rating, ratings volume, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

TQS Code Reader is free to download; Sampling Calculator costs $5.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Sampling Calculator against 5.0 for TQS Code Reader. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 2 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Sampling Calculator ships an update every 16 months, TQS Code Reader every 6 months. The most recent releases landed on September 10, 2026 and September 20, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 7 level
Sampling Calculator versus TQS Code Reader: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterSampling CalculatorTQS Code Reader
Price$5.99Free — better
Rating5.0 (1 ratings)5.0 (2 ratings)
Positive reviews50.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings12 — better
Update frequencyEvery 16 monthsEvery 6 months — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationPaidFree — better
Best chart rank#173 — better—
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS15.615.5 — better
Further details — not scored
Size3 MB33 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperJuan Manuel Alfredo SanchezWIPOTEC GmbH

Customer experience

Sampling Calculator

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews2 reviews
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%

TQS Code Reader

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Sampling Calculator

No in-app purchases

None

TQS Code Reader

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Sampling Calculator free?
Sampling Calculator costs $5.99, with no in-app purchases.
Is TQS Code Reader free?
TQS Code Reader is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Sampling Calculator or TQS Code Reader?
Sampling Calculator and TQS Code Reader are both rated 5.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 1 and 2 ratings respectively.
Do Sampling Calculator or TQS Code Reader have ads?
Neither Sampling Calculator nor TQS Code Reader shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Sampling Calculator or TQS Code Reader?
Sampling Calculator ships an update every 16 months, and TQS Code Reader every 6 months. Most recently, Sampling Calculator was updated on September 10, 2026 and TQS Code Reader on September 20, 2026.

Other comparisons