Comparison

HTTPS4All vs Table of contents

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

HTTPS4All

Browse the internet securely by automatically redirecting to the secure HTTPS version of websites. It utilizes an extensive database to ensure your online connections are protected.

Highlights
  • Automatic HTTPS redirection
  • Extensive secure site database
  • Enhanced online security
  • Derived from EFF's HTTPS Everywhere
Features
Read full description

Browse securely online with HTTPS4All. This app has an extensive database of sites that support secure connections, and will automatically redirect you to the secure version when you access those sites. The database is derived from the HTTPS Everywhere project from the EFF.

About

Table of contents

Quickly navigate any webpage with sections. This Safari extension displays a list of all headings, allowing you to instantly jump to specific content. Ideal for articles and documentation pages.

Highlights
  • List webpage headings
  • Instantly jump to sections
  • Works on articles and documentation
  • Safari extension
Features
Read full description

Table of contents is a Safari extension for quickly navigating documents. In any web page with sections—an article, a documentation page, etc—summon Table of contents to see a list of all headings in the page. Tap any to jump to it instantly.

Screenshots

HTTPS4All2 screens
Table of contents1 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: HTTPS4All at 4.3 against Table of contents's 4.0. HTTPS4All also leads on ratings volume (26 vs 3) and iOS requirement (10.0 vs 15.0). Table of contents's advantage is review sentiment (100% vs 88%). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

HTTPS4All holds the better App Store score, 4.3 against 4.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: HTTPS4All has 26 ratings behind it against 3, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews complicate that: 88% of HTTPS4All's written reviews are positive against 100% of Table of contents's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
HTTPS4All versus Table of contents: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterHTTPS4AllTable of contents
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.3 (26 ratings) — better4.0 (3 ratings)
Positive reviews87.5% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings26 — better3
Update frequency—Every 4 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod, Mac — better
Requires iOS10.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size9 MB1 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperBouke van der BijlNathan Manceaux-Panot

Customer experience

HTTPS4All

All ratings26 ratings
Positive80.8%
Neutral3.8%
Negative15.4%
Written reviews8 reviews
Positive87.5%
Neutral0.0%
Negative12.5%

Table of contents

All ratings3 ratings
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

HTTPS4All

No in-app purchases

None

Table of contents

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is HTTPS4All free?
HTTPS4All is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Table of contents free?
Table of contents is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, HTTPS4All or Table of contents?
HTTPS4All is rated higher. HTTPS4All averages 4.3 out of 5 from 26 ratings, while Table of contents averages 4.0 from 3 ratings.
Do HTTPS4All or Table of contents have ads?
Neither HTTPS4All nor Table of contents shows ads.

Other comparisons