CHRONGRAPH vs WiFi_CAM
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
CHRONGRAPH
This app connects to Bluetooth hardware to display test speed history. Users can set object weight and diameter. It facilitates data logging and configuration for specific tests.
- Bluetooth connectivity
- Display test speed history
- Set object weight
- Set object diameter
- Data logging
Read full descriptionHide full description
The App communicates with the hardware via bluetooth connection hardware. Its main functions are as follows: 1. Connect bluetooth 2. Display the history of test speed. 3. Set the weight and diameter of the object.
WiFi_CAM
View real-time images and videos from compatible toys via WiFi. Capture photos and record videos directly from your toy's perspective and review your saved media.
- Real-time WiFi image display
- Take photos via WiFi
- Record videos via WiFi
- Review photo and video files
Read full descriptionHide full description
This app is specially created for toys, which allows you to see things in an real awesome way! Main function: 1. Real time display of the image from toys via WiFi 2. Take photo and video from toys via WiFi transmission; 3. Review the photo and video files.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is ads: CHRONGRAPH at none against WiFi_CAM's shown. CHRONGRAPH also leads on review sentiment (50% vs 23%) and monetization model (free vs ad-supported). WiFi_CAM's advantage is ratings volume (950 vs 3) and rating (2.6 vs 2.3). On price, update cadence, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
WiFi_CAM holds the better App Store score, 2.6 against 2.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: WiFi_CAM has 950 ratings behind it against 3, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews complicate that: 50% of CHRONGRAPH's written reviews are positive against 23% of WiFi_CAM's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.
Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 2 months. Both last shipped on October 24, 2026.
| Parameter | CHRONGRAPH | WiFi_CAM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 2.3 (3 ratings) | 2.6 (950 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 50.0% of reviews — better | 23.3% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 3 | 950 — better |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | Every 2 months |
| Ads | No — better | Yes |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free — better | Ad-supported |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 8.0 — better | 9.3 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 8 MB | 166 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 17+ |
| Developer | DKC Technology Co., Ltd. | 深圳市天之衡电子科技有限公司 |
Customer experience
CHRONGRAPH
WiFi_CAM
Bugs and requests
CHRONGRAPH
Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.
WiFi_CAM
Reported bugs
4 issues- App crashes frequently
- Orientation issues with screen
- Connectivity problems with drone
- Camera not working as expected
Requested features
5 requests- Add ability to download/save videos
- Improve app stability
- Add English language support
- Improve camera controls
- Add ability to customize settings
In-app purchases
CHRONGRAPH
No in-app purchases
WiFi_CAM
No in-app purchases
