Comparison

RF Path vs PulseQSO

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

RF Path

Calculate radio frequency propagation loss using various models like Irregular Terrain, Okumura-Hata, and COST-231. Supports area and point-to-point predictions, with results exportable via email or social media.

Highlights
  • Multiple propagation models (Irregular Terrain, Okumura-Hata, COST-231)
  • Area Prediction mode
  • Point-to-Point prediction mode
  • Elevation profile display
  • Results export (CSV)
  • Save to iCloud
  • Share to social media
Features
Read full description

RF Path provides propagation loss calculations for radio frequencies (RF) between 20 MHz and 20 GHz using either the Irregular Terrain model, Okumura-Hata model, COST-231 Hata Extension model, or the COST-231 Walfish-Ikegami model. The calculations are based on both electromagnetic theory and the statistical analysis of terrain characteristics to calculate the degradation of the RF wave as a function of distance and the variability of the RF wave with respect to time and space. The Irregular Terrain Model has two different prediction models. One is the Area Prediction mode which calculates propagation losses over an area where the exact terrain parameters are not known, but approximated using terrain roughness, environmental parameters and statistical parameters. The second is a point-to-point mode where specific latitude/longitude pair values are entered for both transmitter and receiver. Environmental parameters and statistical parameters are also used in this prediction mode. The results may be saved to iCloud, emailed, or posted to Facebook or Twitter. The results are in CSV format. In the Area Prediction mode a table along with a graph shows the path loss over the distance entered into the settings. The graph is viewed by rotating the device once the results table is shown. In the Point-To-Point Prediction mode a table along with a graph shows the path loss and elevation profile of the RF path.

About

PulseQSO

This application serves as a digital logbook for amateur radio enthusiasts. It allows users to record QSO correspondences and contact details, with data securely stored and synced across multiple Apple devices via iCloud.

Highlights
  • Amateur radio QSO logging
  • Contact information storage
  • iCloud data synchronization
  • Cross-device compatibility (Mac, iOS, iPadOS)
  • Secure, device-only data storage
Read full description

PulseQSO is a logbook for Amateur Radio stations to log their QSO correspondences and contact information. The PulseQSO uses Apple's iCloud to store all the app's data, keeping everything updated across multiple devices. ll data is securely stored only on the device user's iCloud account. No data is stored anywhere else. PulseQSO is available on Mac, iOS and iPadOS.

Screenshots

RF Path4 screens
PulseQSO4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: PulseQSO at Free against RF Path's $2.99. PulseQSO also leads on rating (4.0 vs 3.5). RF Path's advantage is update cadence (every 5 months vs every 39 months) and chart position (#165 vs unranked). On review sentiment, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

PulseQSO is free to download; RF Path costs $2.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

PulseQSO holds the better App Store score, 4.0 against 3.5. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 4 and 1 respectively. Written reviews split almost evenly too, at 50% and 50% positive.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

RF Path ships an update every 5 months, PulseQSO every 39 months. The most recent releases landed on September 21, 2026 and June 1, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard7 real differences · 4 level
RF Path versus PulseQSO: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterRF PathPulseQSO
Price$2.99Free — better
Rating3.5 (4 ratings)4.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews50.0% of reviews50.0% of reviews
Number of ratings4 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 5 months — betterEvery 39 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationPaidFree — better
Best chart rank#165 — better—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod, MaciPhone, iPad, iPod, Mac
Requires iOS13.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size15 MB7 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperTom DohertyPulsely Consulting Limited

Customer experience

RF Path

All ratings4 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral25.0%
Negative25.0%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive50.0%
Neutral25.0%
Negative25.0%

PulseQSO

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews2 reviews
Positive50.0%
Neutral50.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

RF Path

No in-app purchases

None

PulseQSO

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is RF Path free?
RF Path costs $2.99, with no in-app purchases.
Is PulseQSO free?
PulseQSO is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, RF Path or PulseQSO?
PulseQSO is rated higher. RF Path averages 3.5 out of 5 from 4 ratings, while PulseQSO averages 4.0 from 1 ratings.
Do RF Path or PulseQSO have ads?
Neither RF Path nor PulseQSO shows ads.
Which is updated more often, RF Path or PulseQSO?
RF Path ships an update every 5 months, and PulseQSO every 39 months. Most recently, RF Path was updated on September 21, 2026 and PulseQSO on June 1, 2026.

Other comparisons