Comparison

CIS Token vs 自助配音

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

CIS Token

Features
Read full description

CIS Token provides the 2FA service for CIS online trading platform.

About

自助配音

Features
Read full description

【主要功能】 1.用户自助配音,有众多主播音色可供选择; 2.提供配音样例参考:广告叫卖、促销、短视频解说配音、故事说书、来电提醒、自媒体配音、 企业宣传、广播播音、教学录音、语音提示、商场促销配音、新店开业配音、产品介绍配音等。 3.支持多语种,英语、粤语、普通话、东北话、湖南话、台湾话、四川话等多个语种。 4.一键导出配音好的文件,支持MP3格式、MP4格式文件配音文件导出 5.支持配音设置背景音乐,支持自己上传背景音乐。 6.支持主播不同情绪下的语调,适用各种场景。 可以导出到U盘循环播放、可以分享给好友社交软件、可以下载MP4格式、配成短视频配音。 用户可以自己制作配音,众多功能自助配音。文字转语音智能AI。

Screenshots

CIS Token2 screens
自助配音4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: CIS Token at none against 自助配音's 3. CIS Token also leads on iOS requirement (10.0 vs 12.1). On price, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 自助配音 sells 3 one-off in-app purchases. CIS Token asks for nothing beyond the download.

Scorecard2 real differences · 4 level
CIS Token versus 自助配音: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterCIS Token自助配音
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 15 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS10.0 — better12.1
Further details — not scored
Size26 MB38 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperChina International Securities LimitedNanchang Xuanyou Technology Co., Ltd

In-app purchases

None

CIS Token

No in-app purchases

3 purchases

自助配音

One-time3
  • 自助配音_月度会员$3.99
  • 自助配音_季度会员$9.99
  • 自助配音_年度会员$29.99

Questions

Is CIS Token free?
CIS Token is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 自助配音 free?
自助配音 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Do CIS Token or 自助配音 have ads?
Neither CIS Token nor 自助配音 shows ads.

Other comparisons