Comparison

Workouts Timer PRO vs Running Pacer

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Workouts Timer PRO

This app provides customizable timers for various high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and circuit training workouts. It supports popular formats like Tabata, AMRAP, For Time, and EMOM, helping users structure their fitness routines effectively.

Highlights
  • Tabata timer
  • AMRAP timer
  • For Time workout support
  • EMOM timer
  • Customizable workout structure
Features
Read full description

Supporting: - Tabata - Amrap - For Time - Emom If none of the above makes sense to you, that's a clear sign you need to start working out for real!

About

Running Pacer

Easily convert running paces between minutes per kilometer and minutes per mile. This tool also helps you visualize your pace for various race distances.

Highlights
  • Pace conversion (min/km to min/mile)
  • Race distance pace calculation
  • Supports common race distances
  • Simple and intuitive interface
Features
Read full description

Use this app to convert your running pace between minutes per km & minutes per mile. You can also use it to see what your pace translates to for common race distances!

Screenshots

Workouts Timer PRO3 screens
Running Pacer2 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: Running Pacer at none against Workouts Timer PRO's shown. Running Pacer also leads on monetization model (free vs ad-supported). Workouts Timer PRO's advantage is device support (3 vs 1) and ratings volume (3 vs 1). On price, rating, update cadence and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Workouts Timer PRO against 5.0 for Running Pacer. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 3 and 1 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Workouts Timer PRO ships an update every 4 days, Running Pacer weekly. The most recent releases landed on September 24, 2026 and October 4, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
Workouts Timer PRO versus Running Pacer: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterWorkouts Timer PRORunning Pacer
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (3 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings)
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings3 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 4 days — betterWeekly
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationAd-supportedFree — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone
Requires iOS14.0 — better17.0
Further details — not scored
Size29 MB5 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperGianluca Di MaggioRGB-Studio

Customer experience

Workouts Timer PRO

All ratings3 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Running Pacer

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Workouts Timer PRO

No in-app purchases

None

Running Pacer

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Workouts Timer PRO free?
Workouts Timer PRO is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Running Pacer free?
Running Pacer is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Workouts Timer PRO or Running Pacer?
Workouts Timer PRO and Running Pacer are both rated 5.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 3 and 1 ratings respectively.
Do Workouts Timer PRO or Running Pacer have ads?
Workouts Timer PRO shows ads; Running Pacer does not.
Which is updated more often, Workouts Timer PRO or Running Pacer?
Workouts Timer PRO ships an update every 4 days, and Running Pacer weekly. Most recently, Workouts Timer PRO was updated on September 24, 2026 and Running Pacer on October 4, 2026.

Other comparisons