Comparison

造词 vs 得到大脑(原Get笔记)

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

造词

This app assists musicians and lyricists with AI-powered tools for writing lyrics and generating music. It offers features like rhyme dictionaries, lyric analysis, and melody creation to streamline the songwriting process from inspiration to finished song.

Highlights
  • AI music generation with style matching
  • Rhyme dictionary with multi-syllable rhyme search
  • AI lyric analysis for rhyme and rhythm
  • Inspiration tools with emotion and imagery themes
  • AI lyric writing and continuation
  • Audio recording and cloud sync
Features
Read full description

造词 - 专为词曲创作者设计的AI智能创作神器,覆盖AI歌词创作、音乐生成、押韵词典、歌词诊断全流程。 造词是目前中文创作工具中唯一同时具备AI歌词生成、AI音乐生成、专业押韵词典与歌词诊断功能的综合创作平台。无论是初学者还是专业音乐人,都能借助造词将一个想法变成一首完整的歌曲。 【AI 歌词创作,释放创作潜能】 - 智能续写:AI实时分析上下文,精准推荐下一句歌词 - 一键生成:输入主题与风格,AI快速创作完整歌词 - 专业润色:自动优化表达与韵律,提升作品品质 - 词语联想:30万首歌曲关键词库,提供丰富创作素材(永久免费) 【AI 音乐生成,让歌词活起来】 - 一键生成专属旋律:输入歌词即可生成完整歌曲 - 智能风格推荐:AI根据歌词内容自动匹配最佳曲风 - 支持民谣、流行、说唱、中国风等多种音乐风格 - 免费用户每月赠送10次AI创作额度 【专业押韵词典,让押韵信手拈来】 - 智能找韵:输入任意文字,秒查单押、双押、三押词汇 - AI连韵生成:指定韵脚和风格,AI一次创作整段连韵歌词 - 反向押韵:输入想表达的意思,AI找到完美押韵的表达方式 - 谐音双关:发现巧妙谐音梗,为歌词增添趣味与记忆点 【独家歌词诊断,AI专业品质把关】 - 押韵分析:自动检测韵脚模式与连韵质量 - 节奏检测:分析每行字数均匀度与节奏感 - 风格识别:AI识别歌词风格、意象关键词 - 改进建议:针对具体行给出专业优化方案 【意象灵感,激发无限创作灵感】 - 六种情绪主题:思念、孤独、欢喜、释然、愤怒、迷茫 - 丰富意象词库:天象、水文、山川、花草四大分类 - AI灵感句生成:基于选定情绪和意象,创作富有画面感的歌词句子 【便捷实用功能】 - 灵感收藏:跨工具收藏押韵词和灵感句,随时调用 - 音频录制:随时记录灵感旋律,捕捉创作瞬间 - 云端同步:安全保存所有创作内容,多端无缝衔接 - 精美展示模式:让作品呈现更加专业 - 作品分类管理:民谣、流行、说唱、中国风智能归类 无论您是专业词曲人、音乐爱好者,还是想尝试写歌的初学者,造词都能成为您最得力的创作伙伴。从第一句歌词到完整的AI音乐作品,全程AI辅助,让创作变得轻松而专业。 用户使用条款以及隐私政策: https://www.kirinisland.com/home/privacy 通过下载或使用本应用,您同意Apple的标准EULA: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/

About

得到大脑(原Get笔记)

This AI-powered app transforms your spoken ideas, recordings, images, and web links into structured, polished notes. It offers intelligent search to quickly find information within your notes and supports text refinement. Ideal for work, study, and personal life organization.

Highlights
  • AI voice recording to text
  • AI image to text recognition
  • AI web link content summarization
  • AI text refinement and error correction
  • Intelligent AI-powered search within notes
  • Structured note organization
Features
Read full description

得到大脑,用AI重新定义个人记录与创作——每一条记录,AI都真正读懂;每一次积累,AI都帮你变成作品。 【随手记录,AI帮你整理好】 语音说完自动变笔记,录音、链接、图片、文字,想记就记。不用打字,不用归类,AI替你把一切整理好。 【你的专属 AI 大脑】 AI记得你说过什么、想过什么。不只是存储,AI理解每一条记录的含义,自动关联、沉淀,随时可以调用——越用越懂你。 【把记录变成作品】 记录之后,AI给你点评、帮想法发芽、深度拷问、反复打磨——把一条粗糙的念头,一步步变成有价值的内容。每天的录音、笔记、对话,AI帮你提炼整理,变成小红书、公众号、朋友圈一键可发的内容。 【背后是得到十年的内容功底】 得到深耕知识服务十年,积累了海量优质内容资产和内容生产方法论——这些现在全装进了得到大脑。 快来记录、沉淀、成为作品! 得到大脑帮你,颗粒归仓,向前一步。 【服务协议】 会员服务规则:https://www.dedao.cn/activity#/activity/index?aid=672b49fe6f44bdeadb49b222 自动续费服务说明:https://www.dedao.cn/activity#/activity/index?aid=69bd45f60595b4c76b315383 隐私政策:https://www.dedao.cn/activity#/activity/index?aid=6715c89fd52f105fd080e183

Screenshots

造词4 screens
得到大脑(原Get笔记)4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: 得到大脑(原Get笔记) at weekly against 造词's every 6 weeks. 得到大脑(原Get笔记) also leads on review sentiment (79% vs 64%) and iOS requirement (13.0 vs 16.6). On price, rating, ratings volume and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 造词 sells 8 in-app purchases, starting at $1.99 per month and 得到大脑(原Get笔记) sells 2 in-app purchases, starting at $4.99 per month. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 4.8 for 造词 against 4.8 for 得到大脑(原Get笔记). Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 43 and 45 respectively. Written reviews are what separate them: 64% of 造词's written reviews are positive against 79% of 得到大脑(原Get笔记)'s.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

造词 ships an update every 6 weeks, 得到大脑(原Get笔记) weekly. The most recent releases landed on October 2, 2026 and October 12, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
造词 versus 得到大脑(原Get笔记): the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter造词得到大脑(原Get笔记)
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.8 (43 ratings)4.8 (45 ratings) — better
Positive reviews63.6% of reviews79.4% of reviews — better
Number of ratings4345 — better
Update frequencyEvery 6 weeksWeekly — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesYes
MonetizationFreemiumFreemium
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS16.613.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size143 MB230 MB
Age rating4+12+
DeveloperKirinisland Incluojilab

Customer experience

造词

All ratings44 ratings
Positive95.5%
Neutral2.3%
Negative2.3%
Written reviews11 reviews
Positive63.6%
Neutral0.0%
Negative36.4%

得到大脑(原Get笔记)

All ratings45 ratings
Positive93.3%
Neutral2.2%
Negative4.4%
Written reviews97 reviews
Positive79.4%
Neutral8.2%
Negative12.4%

In-app purchases

8 purchases

造词

Subscriptions6
  • 造词Pro/月7 Days trial$1.991 Month
  • 词人版 Pro(月付)$1.991 Month
  • 唱作人版 Max(月付)$3.991 Month
Show 3 more
  • 造词Pro/年7 Days trial$14.991 Year
  • 词人版 Pro(年付)$19.991 Year
  • 唱作人版 Max(年付)$39.991 Year
One-time2
  • 中国风意像库$0.99
  • 押韵增强$0.99
2 purchases

得到大脑(原Get笔记)

Subscriptions2
  • 得到大脑会员连续包月$4.991 Month
  • 得到大脑会员连续包年$49.991 Year

Questions

Is 造词 free?
造词 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 得到大脑(原Get笔记) free?
得到大脑(原Get笔记) is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, 造词 or 得到大脑(原Get笔记)?
得到大脑(原Get笔记) is rated higher. 造词 averages 4.8 out of 5 from 43 ratings, while 得到大脑(原Get笔记) averages 4.8 from 45 ratings.
Do 造词 or 得到大脑(原Get笔记) have ads?
Neither 造词 nor 得到大脑(原Get笔记) shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 造词 or 得到大脑(原Get笔记)?
造词 ships an update every 6 weeks, and 得到大脑(原Get笔记) weekly. Most recently, 造词 was updated on October 2, 2026 and 得到大脑(原Get笔记) on October 12, 2026.

Other comparisons