Comparison

Bark vs PhyOTA

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Bark

Send custom push notifications to your iPhone via an HTTP API. Supports advanced features like custom icons, grouping, and critical alerts. Offers privacy-protected, end-to-end encrypted pushes with self-deployable server options.

Highlights
  • HTTP API for push notifications
  • Custom icons and grouping
  • Continuous and critical alerts
  • End-to-end push encryption
  • Self-deployable server options
  • Privacy-protected notifications
Features
Read full description

You can send push notifications to your iPhone by simply calling an HTTP API. Bark supports many advanced iOS push features, such as custom icons, notification grouping, custom ringtones, continuous alerts, critical alerts, and encrypted pushes. Bark does not consume device battery, as its core functionality relies on system push services and push extensions, and the app itself does not need to be running. Bark ensures your privacy and security with high reliability. Bark supports self-deploying the server, which can be deployed via Docker, Serverless, or Cloudflare Worker. The bark-server supports most operating systems, and you can also run it manually. The app is compiled and uploaded through Github Action, ensuring that the version you’re using is compiled from open-source code, without any modifications by anyone (including the author). Bark supports end-to-end push encryption with a custom key, ensuring that the push content is not accessed or leaked by the Bark server or Apple’s APNs server during transmission. The notification message history saved locally by Bark is also very secure. Using the NotificationServiceExtension, the push message is only stored on the device when the push is received. Feedback email: to@day.app Privacy Policy: https://api.day.app/privacy User Agreement: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/

About

PhyOTA

This utility app facilitates over-the-air (OTA) upgrades for BLE chips. It supports various chip generations and features like Xip and encrypted OTA functionality, offering a simple integration demo.

Highlights
  • BLE chip OTA upgrades
  • Support for 1st gen 6202 chips
  • Support for 2nd gen 6212 chips
  • Long packet transmission
  • Xip support
  • Encrypted OTA functionality
Features
Read full description

奉加微电子(上海)有限公司于2015年05月11日成立。 此程序支持成立来成立所有BLE芯片OTA空中升级功能。 iOS_OTA做最简单的OTA集成Demo程序。 项目包含:(1)一代6202芯片20字节传输hex和res(2)二代6212芯片使用长包传输hex和Res(3)支持Xip(4)支持加密OTA功能

Screenshots

Bark3 screens
PhyOTA4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: Bark at 98% against PhyOTA's 0%. Bark also leads on rating (4.9 vs 1.0) and ratings volume (105 vs 1). PhyOTA's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 2). On price, update cadence, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Bark sells 2 in-app purchases, starting at $2.69 per year. PhyOTA asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Bark holds the better App Store score, 4.9 against 1.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Bark has 105 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 98% of Bark's written reviews are positive against 0% of PhyOTA's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Bark ships an update every 3 weeks, PhyOTA every 6 weeks. The most recent releases landed on September 21, 2026 and September 17, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard6 real differences · 4 level
Bark versus PhyOTA: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterBarkPhyOTA
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.9 (105 ratings) — better1.0 (1 ratings)
Positive reviews98.3% of reviews — better0.0% of reviews
Number of ratings105 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeks — betterEvery 6 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
MonetizationFree with in-app purchasesFree — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS13.0 — better15.6
Further details — not scored
Size32 MB3 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer丰 黄奉加微电子

Customer experience

Bark

All ratings105 ratings
Positive97.1%
Neutral0.0%
Negative2.9%
Written reviews59 reviews
Positive98.3%
Neutral1.7%
Negative0.0%

PhyOTA

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

In-app purchases

2 purchases

Bark

Subscriptions1
  • Continuous support$2.691 Year
One-time1
  • One-time donation$2.69
None

PhyOTA

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Bark free?
Bark is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is PhyOTA free?
PhyOTA is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Bark or PhyOTA?
Bark is rated higher. Bark averages 4.9 out of 5 from 105 ratings, while PhyOTA averages 1.0 from 1 ratings.
Do Bark or PhyOTA have ads?
Neither Bark nor PhyOTA shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Bark or PhyOTA?
Bark ships an update every 3 weeks, and PhyOTA every 6 weeks. Most recently, Bark was updated on September 21, 2026 and PhyOTA on September 17, 2026.

Other comparisons