Bark vs 奥智联
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Bark
Send custom push notifications to your iPhone via an HTTP API. Supports advanced features like custom icons, grouping, and critical alerts. Offers privacy-protected, end-to-end encrypted pushes with self-deployable server options.
- HTTP API for push notifications
- Custom icons and grouping
- Continuous and critical alerts
- End-to-end push encryption
- Self-deployable server options
- Privacy-protected notifications
Read full descriptionHide full description
You can send push notifications to your iPhone by simply calling an HTTP API. Bark supports many advanced iOS push features, such as custom icons, notification grouping, custom ringtones, continuous alerts, critical alerts, and encrypted pushes. Bark does not consume device battery, as its core functionality relies on system push services and push extensions, and the app itself does not need to be running. Bark ensures your privacy and security with high reliability. Bark supports self-deploying the server, which can be deployed via Docker, Serverless, or Cloudflare Worker. The bark-server supports most operating systems, and you can also run it manually. The app is compiled and uploaded through Github Action, ensuring that the version you’re using is compiled from open-source code, without any modifications by anyone (including the author). Bark supports end-to-end push encryption with a custom key, ensuring that the push content is not accessed or leaked by the Bark server or Apple’s APNs server during transmission. The notification message history saved locally by Bark is also very secure. Using the NotificationServiceExtension, the push message is only stored on the device when the push is received. Feedback email: to@day.app Privacy Policy: https://api.day.app/privacy User Agreement: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/
奥智联
Read full descriptionHide full description
奥智联是辽宁科大物联科技有限公司最新研发的一款即插即用型车载智能终端,专注于汽车安全驾驶和汽车增值服务应用,提供主动安全检测、远程点火/熄火、碰撞移位报警,低电压报警、故障报警、疲劳驾驶提醒、行驶轨迹回放、驾驶行为分析、固件远程升级、定位追踪、电子围栏等功能。可让车主通过使用专属的App实现对车辆的远程控制和监测,身临其境地体验汽车对我们生活的改变.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: Bark at 4.9 against 奥智联's 4.3. Bark also leads on update cadence (every 3 weeks vs every 3 months) and ratings volume (111 vs 6). 奥智联's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 2). On price, ads, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Bark sells 2 in-app purchases, starting at $2.69 per year. 奥智联 asks for nothing beyond the download.
Bark holds the better App Store score, 4.9 against 4.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Bark has 111 ratings behind it against 6, so its average is the more settled of the two.
Bark ships an update every 3 weeks, 奥智联 every 3 months. The most recent releases landed on November 2, 2026 and November 3, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | Bark | 奥智联 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.9 (111 ratings) — better | 4.3 (6 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 98.4% of reviews | — |
| Number of ratings | 111 — better | 6 |
| Update frequency | Every 3 weeks — better | Every 3 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | Yes | No — better |
| Monetization | Free with in-app purchases | — |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 15.0 | 15.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 32 MB | 52 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 17+ |
| Developer | 丰 黄 | USTL Internet of Things Co., Ltd. |
Customer experience
Bark
奥智联
In-app purchases
Bark
- Continuous support$2.691 Year
- One-time donation$2.69
奥智联
No in-app purchases









