Comparison

星空交友(原老版树洞) vs 乐友圈

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

星空交友(原老版树洞)

An app with a sleek dark-themed interface for secure and encrypted night-time chatting, ensuring a smooth user experience. For feedback or assistance, contact help@qxchat.cn with your account details.

Features
Read full description

星空交友|不随波逐流,让社交回归本真,让相遇充满温柔。不同于传统交友、聊天APP的套路化匹配,我们以星空为核心意象,将匿名倾诉的安全感与同城交友的即时感完美融合,打破孤独壁垒,缔造有温度、有灵魂的社交体验。 这里既是你的私人情绪驿站——匿名树洞可倾诉所有心事,悄悄话传递未说出口的情愫,银行级加密技术全程守护隐私,让你毫无顾忌地释放自我;也是你的交港湾——精准匹配同频好友,即时聊天、轻松约见,漂流瓶牵起陌生缘分,每一次互动都充满惊喜。 不刻意、不浮躁,不强制社交、不套路引流,只做一个有温度的社交载体。星空之下,每一个孤独的灵魂,都能遇见合拍的同行者,让心事有处安放,让陪伴不期而遇。无需伪装,不必迎合,在这里,做自己就好,总会有人与你并肩,共赏这片专属星空。 【问题反馈】 遇到问题可以通过电子邮件 help@qxchat.cn 联系我们(邮件备注账号信息)

About

乐友圈

Features
Read full description

每个人都有自己的圈子,而乐友圈是属于大家共同的圈子,快来乐友圈享受圈子的快乐吧。

Screenshots

星空交友(原老版树洞)3 screens
乐友圈3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 星空交友(原老版树洞) at 4.0 against 乐友圈's 1.0. 星空交友(原老版树洞) also leads on update cadence (fortnightly vs every 5 months) and ratings volume (719 vs 2). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 星空交友(原老版树洞) sells 2 one-off in-app purchases and 乐友圈 sells 4 one-off in-app purchases. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

星空交友(原老版树洞) holds the better App Store score, 4.0 against 1.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 星空交友(原老版树洞) has 719 ratings behind it against 2, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

星空交友(原老版树洞) ships an update fortnightly, 乐友圈 every 5 months. The most recent releases landed on October 21, 2026 and October 16, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 6 level
星空交友(原老版树洞) versus 乐友圈: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter星空交友(原老版树洞)乐友圈
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.0 (719 ratings) — better1.0 (2 ratings)
Positive reviews40.8% of reviews—
Number of ratings719 — better2
Update frequencyFortnightly — betterEvery 5 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesYes
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS11.011.0
Further details — not scored
Size8 MB66 MB
Age rating17+17+
Developer鹏 罗Guangzhou Qianqian culture media Co., Ltd

Customer experience

星空交友(原老版树洞)

All ratings721 ratings
Positive74.2%
Neutral4.9%
Negative20.9%
Written reviews304 reviews
Positive40.8%
Neutral9.2%
Negative50.0%

乐友圈

All ratings2 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

Bugs and requests

星空交友(原老版树洞)

Reported bugs

3 issues
  • Inability to log in after device changes
  • Inconsistent behavior when adding friends
  • Unreliable message delivery and notification system

Requested features

4 requests
  • Add password recovery option
  • Improve account management and portability
  • Enhance content moderation and user safety
  • Introduce more free and accessible features

乐友圈

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

In-app purchases

2 purchases

星空交友(原老版树洞)

One-time2
  • 会员(30天到期)无自动续费$3.99
  • 100颗小星星$9.99
4 purchases

乐友圈

One-time4
  • 38元266金币$4.99
  • 78元546金币$9.99
  • 168元1176金币$24.99
Show 1 more
  • 348元2436金币$49.99

Questions

Is 星空交友(原老版树洞) free?
星空交友(原老版树洞) is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 乐友圈 free?
乐友圈 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, 星空交友(原老版树洞) or 乐友圈?
星空交友(原老版树洞) is rated higher. 星空交友(原老版树洞) averages 4.0 out of 5 from 719 ratings, while 乐友圈 averages 1.0 from 2 ratings.
Do 星空交友(原老版树洞) or 乐友圈 have ads?
Neither 星空交友(原老版树洞) nor 乐友圈 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 星空交友(原老版树洞) or 乐友圈?
星空交友(原老版树洞) ships an update fortnightly, and 乐友圈 every 5 months. Most recently, 星空交友(原老版树洞) was updated on October 21, 2026 and 乐友圈 on October 16, 2026.

Other comparisons