EchoRef vs COAPT Risk Score
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
EchoRef
This educational reference app provides comprehensive information on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), echocardiography, and cardiac measurements. It includes lessons on interventional procedures and hemodynamic calculations for medical professionals.
- Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)
- Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
- Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)
- Cardiac dimensions and valve measurements
- Hemodynamic and ultrasound calculations
- Interventional procedure lessons
Read full descriptionHide full description
EchoRef is a free iOS ultrasonography educational reference covering point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Additionally, it contains cardiac dimensions, native/prosthetic valve measurements, hemodynamic/ultrasound calculations, and lessons ranging from interventional procedures to mechanical circulatory support. This app is intended for educational and informational purposes only. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the guidance of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition, and never disregard or delay seeking professional advice because of information provided by this app. About Rishi Kumar, MD, FACC ("RK.MD") I'm an adult cardiothoracic anesthesiologist and cardiovascular ICU intensivist practicing in academic medicine. I'm passionate about teaching with free, open-access medical education. Learn more on my site: https://rk.md
COAPT Risk Score
This medical tool calculates a 2-year risk score for death and/or heart failure hospitalization in patients with specific heart conditions. It combines clinical and echocardiographic data to aid in shared decision-making regarding treatment options.
- Risk prediction for death and heart failure hospitalization
- Calculates 2-year risk score
- Combines clinical and echocardiographic variables
- Supports shared decision-making
- Educational tool for medical professionals
- Based on COAPT trial data
Read full descriptionHide full description
For educational purposes and for use by medical professionals only. For patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation and symptomatic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction between 20-50%) despite best medical therapy. The COAPT Risk Score is a simple risk prediction tool created by combining clinical and echocardiographic variables in patients with heart failure (HF) and moderate-to-severe or severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) who remain symptomatic despite maximally tolerated guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT). The COAPT Risk Score provides valuable prognostic information regarding the 2-year risk of death and/or heart failure hospitalization (HFH). The score is derived from the COAPT trial population of patients with HF and moderate-to-severe or severe FMR randomized to treatment with either transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with MitraClip plus GDMT or GDMT alone. We can incorporate TEER in the risk score and provide updated 2-year risk of death and/or HFH which can serve as a valuable shared decision-making tool for patients and physicians as well as heart teams while deciding about TEER. Created by a team of subject-matter experts including: the director of The Mount Sinai Hospital cardiac cath lab Dr. Kini, Director of Clinical and Interventional Cardiology at the Mount Sinai Health System Dr Sharma, the Mount Sinai Hospital Surgical Director Dr. Tang, COAPT Principal Investigator Dr. Stone, and COAPT Risk Score publication author Dr. Shah.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is ratings volume: EchoRef at 1.4K against COAPT Risk Score's 1. COAPT Risk Score's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 26.0). On price, rating, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 4.9 for EchoRef against 5.0 for COAPT Risk Score. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: EchoRef has 1.4K ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.
| Parameter | EchoRef | COAPT Risk Score |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.9 (1.4K ratings) | 5.0 (1 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 100.0% of reviews | — |
| Number of ratings | 1.4K — better | 1 |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better |
| Requires iOS | 26.0 | 12.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 105 MB | 28 MB |
| Age rating | 17+ | 17+ |
| Developer | Rishi Kumar | Cardiology Apps LLC |
Customer experience
EchoRef
COAPT Risk Score
In-app purchases
EchoRef
No in-app purchases
COAPT Risk Score
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is EchoRef free?
Is COAPT Risk Score free?
Which has better reviews, EchoRef or COAPT Risk Score?
Do EchoRef or COAPT Risk Score have ads?
Other comparisons















